Empirical Explication of Psychological Space Sovereignty in Indicators of Personality Social Self-Control
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2019-33-49-65Keywords:
psychological space sovereignty, autonomy of behavior, interpersonal interaction, social and psychological adaptation, social self-control, student youthAbstract
The article represents the results of theoretical and empirical study of psychological space sovereignty in the features of social self-control of student youth. The theoretical grounding of the problem concerns the determination issues of psychological space sovereignty, its structural components and effective characteristics of autonomy and success of behavior. It is emphasized that sovereignty of psychological space is condition and result of adaptability, maturity and productivity of personality and interaction success of individuality and society depends on the qualitative characteristics of the formed social self-control of personality. The specification of interrelation between the psychological space sovereignty definition and the social self-control of student youth makes it possible to consider the ability to exercise control over own behavior as indicator of social and psychological adaptation, which compacts the limits of psychological space. The developed program of empirical research, as well as the complex of the used methods of mathematical statistics of the results, allow to specify the theoretical positions in the form of real psychological facts: students with the formed sovereignty of psychological space (high and average level) are more «principled», and hence their orientation on internal experiences in social interaction allows unobstructedly to overcome the negative moments of social and psychological adaptation, and their expressive stability of behavior defines the greater coherence of emotional support of interpersonal interaction; students with unformed sovereignty of psychological space (low level), demonstrate «pragmatism», which blocks the development of adequate system of social self-control, and is expressed in anxiety of social usefulness in interpersonal interaction.
References
2. Bozhko, Yu. P. (2013). Suverenizatsiia osobystosti yak umova profesiinoi uspishnosti [Individual sovereignty as a condition for professional success]. Aktualni pytannia psykholohichnoi nauky. Almanakh studentskoho naukovoho tovarystva – Topical issues of psychological science. Almanac student scholarship, 7, 22–24 [in Ukrainian].
3. Burmistrova-Savenkova, A. V. (2006). Lichnost i sreda: regulyatsiya granits byitiynogo prostranstva [Personality and environment: regulation of the boundaries of existential space]. Krasnodar: Izd-vo Kubanskiy gos. un-t, 232 р. [in Russian].
4. Byuyul, A. P. (2005). TsYofel. SPSS: Iskusstvo obrabotki informatsii. Analiz statisticheskih dannyih i vosstanovlenie skryityih zakonomernostey [Tzofel SPSS: The Art of Information Processing. Analysis of statistical data and restoration of hidden patterns]. Sankt-Peterburg: «DiaSoftYuP», 608 р. [in Russian].
5. Virna, Zh. P., Koshyrets V. V. (2014). Strukturno-funktsionalna orhanizatsiia osobystisnoho prostoru studenskoi molodi [Structural and functional organization of personality space of students youth]. Psykholohichni perspektyvy – Psychological Prospects Journal, 23, 39–54 [in Ukrainian].
6. Horban, H. O. Osobystisnyi prostir subiekta pryiniattia: sotsialno-psykholohichnyi analiz [Personality space of the subject of acceptance: socio-psychological analysis]. Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii – Problems of modern psychology, 2(4), 26–30 [in Ukrainian].
7. Nikiforova, G. S. (Eds.). Diagnostika zdorov’ya. Psihologicheskiy praktikum (2007). Sankt-Peterburg: Rech, 950 р. [in Russian].
8. Klochko, V. E., Galazhinskiy, E. V. (2009). Psihologiya innovatsionnogo povedeniya [Psychology of innovative behavior.]. Tomsk: Tomskiy gosudarstvennyiy universitet, 240 р. [in Russian].
9. Leontev, D. A. (2002). Sovremennaya psihologiya motivatsii [Modern psychology of motivation]. M.: Smyisl, 343 р. [in Russian].
10. Martirosyan, K. V. (2013). Suverennost lichnogo prostranstva kak predmet teoreticheskogo i empiricheskogo psihologicheskogo issledovaniya [Sovereignty of personal space as an object of theoretical and empirical psychological research]. Internet-zhurnal «NAUKOVEDENIE» – Internet journal «SCIENC, 6, 1–15 [in Russian].
11. Muraveva, O. I. (2004). Osobennosti mentalnosti v bazovyih psihologicheskih prostranstvah lichnosti [Features of mentality in the basic psychological spaces of the individual]. Mentalitet i kommunikativnaya sreda v tranzitivnom obschestve – Mentality and communicative environment in a transitive society. V. I. Kabrina, O. I. Muravevoy (Ed.). Tomsk Tomskiy gos. un-t, 56–76 [in Russian].
12. Nartova-Bochaver, S. K. (2005). Oprosnik «Suverennost psihologicheskogo prostranstva» – novyiy metod diagnostiki lichnosti [Questionnaire «The sovereignty of psychological space» – a new method of diagnosis of personality]. Psihologicheskiy zhurnal – Psychological Journal, 5(25), 77–89 [in Russian].
13. Nartova-Bochaver, S. K. (2008). Chelovek suverennyiy: psihologicheskoe isledovanie subekta v ego byitii [Man sovereign: a psychological study of the subject in his being]. SPb.: Piter, 400 р. [in Russian].
14. Nartova-Bochaver, C. K. (2014). Psihologicheskaya suverennost i osobennosti mezhlichnostnogo obscheniya [Psychological sovereignty and interpersonal communication]. Sotsialnaya psihologiya i obschestvo – Social Psychology and Society, 3(5), 42–51 [in Russian].
15. Nikiforov, G. S. (1989). Samokontrol cheloveka [Self-control person]. L.: Iz–vo Leningradskogo universiteta, 192 р. [in Russian].
16. Buryikina, V. M. (Eds.). (2004). Profilaktika professionalnoy deformatsii lichnosti sotrudnika OVD: metodicheskoe posobie [Prevention of professional deformation of the personality of the ATS employee: a methodological guide]. Moskva: IMTs GUK MVD Rossii, 144 р. [in Russian].
17. Salihova, N. R. (2006). Zhiznennoe prostranstvo lichnosti v zavisimosti ot barernosti ili realizuemosti tsennostey [Living space of the individual, depending on the barrier or realizable values]. Izvestiya Tulskogo gos. un-ta. Ser. Psihologiya – Proceedings of the Tula State. un-that. Ser. Psychology, 6, 149–165 [in Russian].
18. Smirnova, Ya. K. (2014). Podhod k suverennoy samodeterminatsii povedeniya v kontekste vremennyih orientatsiy lichnosti [Approach to sovereign self-determination of behavior in the context of temporary orientations of the individual]. Izvestiya Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Proceedings of the Altai State University, 2–1(82), 75–78 [in Russian].
19. Trofimova, Yu. V. (2012). Suverenizatsiya lichnosti kak predmet postneklasicheskoy psihologii [Sovereign personality as a subject of post-non-classical psychology]. Pedagogika. Psihologiya – Pedagogy. Psychology, 1 (2), 64–68 [in Russian].
20. Udachina, P. Yu., Borisova, K. B. (2014). Svyaz suverennosti psihologicheskogo prostranstva lichnosti i ee udovletvorennosti zhiznyu [The relationship of the sovereignty of the psychological space of the individual and her satisfaction with life]. Chelovek. Soobschestvo. Upravlenie: vzglyad molodogo issledovatelya: materialyi HIV Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. – Person. Community. Management: a look of a young researcher: materials of the XIV All-Russian. scientific-practical conf. S. D. Nekrasov (Ed.). Krasnodar: Izd-vo KubGU, 94–97 [in Russian].
21. Shvalb, Yu. M. (2006). K opredeleniyu ponyatiy sredyi i prostranstva v zhizni cheloveka [To the definition of the concepts of environment and space in human life]. EkologIchna psihologIya: hrestomatIya – Ecological psychology: textbook. Yu. M. Shvalba (Ed.). K: Stalker, 212–219 [in Russian].
