Psychological reconstruction of female self-identity in the range of late maturity age crisis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2020-36-225-238Keywords:
female self-identity, late maturity, midlife crisis, physical emancipation, “self-acquisition” synergyAbstract
Purpose. The article is devoted to the theoretical grounding of female self-identity in the range of late maturity age crisis. The aim of the presented material is the theoretical explication of specificity of female self-identity in the range of late maturity age crisis utilizing reconstruction of “cognitive space” of the studied phenomenon. Methods. The method of psychological reconstruction lies as the basis of the theoretical study of the semantic and structural architectonics of the phenomenon of female self-identity that procedurally contributes to singling out formal and logical features of the studied phenomenon within female late maturity age crisis. Results. The results include the theoretical analysis of the basic positions of studying the range of late maturity age crisis of a woman and becoming specificity of her self-identity as a formed sense of personality determination and self-realization. The eclectic approach to the interpretation of the stated problem makes it possible to combine the diversity of “cognitive space” of female self-identity and the experience of late maturity crisis in the scheme of psychological reconstruction of their interrelation. Biological and psychosocial levels of female identity caused by convergence mechanism of functioning have been detailed; the variants of late maturity crisis passing in the forms of physical emancipation and synergy of “self-acquisition” have been determined, functioning under the influence of the convergence mechanism. Conclusions. The conclusions state the “cognitive completeness” of psychological reconstruction of the interrelation between female self-identity and late maturity crisis experience, which can be successfully realized in applied human research in involutionary period of its development.References
Adler, A. (2007). Praktika i teoriya individualnoy psihologii [Practice and theory of individual psychology]. Moskva: Akademicheskiy proekt. [in Russian].
Bazyka Ye.L. (2009). Osoblyvosti zhinochoi identychnosti periodu piznoi zrilosti v zalezhnosti vid yikh sotsialnoho status [Features of female identity in late adulthood depending on their social status]. Visnyk Odeskoho nats. un-tu im. I.I. Mechnikova ; seriia: Psykholohiia - Bulletin of Odessa National University. Psychology, 14(5), 12-20. [in Ukrainian].
Virna Zh.P. (2017). Psykholohichni koordynaty konstruktyvnoho samozberezhennia osobystosti [Psychological coordinates of constructive self-preservation of personality]. Nauk. visnyk Mykolaivskoho nats. un-tu im. V.O. Sukhomlynskoho. Psykholohichni nauky - Scientific Bulletin of Mykolayiv National University. V.O. Sukhomlinsky. Psychological Sciences, 1 (17), 35-40. [in Ukrainian].
Virna Zh.P. (2008). Zhyttieva sytuatsiia: dynamika «Ia» ta samoidentychnist osobystosti [Life situation: the dynamics of "I" and self-identity]. Aktualni problemy psykholohii - Actual problems of psychology, 15(1), 153-158. [in Ukrainian].
Krayg G., Bokum D. (2005). Psihologiya razvitiya [Developmental psychology]. Sankt-Peterburg : Piter. [in Russian].
Kuzikova S.B., Shcherbak T.I. (2020). Psykholohichni osoblyvosti perebihu kryzy serednoho viku [Psychological features of the crisis of middle age]. Nauk. visnyk Kherson. derzh. un-tu. Zb. nauk. prats. Seriia: Psykholohichni nauky - Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Series Psychological Sciences, 2, 132-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32999/ksu2312-3206/2020-2-18 [in Ukrainian].
Louen A. (1999). Predatelstvo tela [Betrayal of the body]. Ekaterinburg : Delovaya kniga. [in Russian].
Maksymenko S.D. (2006). Heneza zdiisnennia osobystosti [The genesis of the implementation of personality]. Kyiv : Vydavnytstvo TOV «KMM». [in Ukrainian].
Mendelevich V.D., Sadyikova R.G. (2003). Zavisimost kak psihologicheskiy i psihopatologicheskiy fenomen (problemyi diagnostiki i differentsiatsii) [Addiction as a psychological and psychopathological phenomenon (problems of diagnosis and differentiation)]. Vestnik klinicheskoy psihologii - Bulletin of Clinical Psychology, 1(2), 23-34. [in Russian].
Sergeeva A.V. (2013). Psihologiya integralnoy identichnosti [Integral identity psychology]. Odessa: Leradruk. [in Russian].
Sokolova E.T., Nikovaeva V.V. (1995). Osobennosti lichnosti pri pogranichnyih rasstroystvah i somaticheskih zabolevaniyah [Personality features in borderline disorders and somatic diseases]. Moskva : Meditsina. [in Russian].
Soldatova E.L. (2006). Ego-identichnost v normativnyih krizisah razvitiya [Ego Identity in Normative Development Crises]. Voprosyi psihologii - Psychology Questions, 5, 74-84. [in Russian].
Tatenko V.A. (2004). Pro «eholohichnyi henezys» u E. Husserlia ta problemu subiektnykh peretvoren psykhiky v ontohenezi [On the "egological genesis" in E. Husserl and the problem of subjective transformations of the psyche in ontogenesis]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo - Psychology and Society, 4, 13-36. [in Ukrainian].
Tatenko V.O. (2013). Psykholohiia intymnoho zhyttia [Psychology of intimate life]. Kirovohrad: Imeks-LTD. [in Ukrainian].
Tytarenko T.M., Kochubeinyk O.M., Cheremnykh K.O. (2014). Psykholohichni praktyky konstruiuvannia zhyttia v umovakh postmodernoi sotsialnosti [Psychological practices of constructing life in the conditions of postmodern sociality]. Kyiv: Milenium. [in Ukrainian].
Erikson E. (2006). Identichnost: yunost i krizis [Identity: youth and crisis]. Moskva: Flinta. [in Russian].
Yung K. G. (2007). Struktura psihiki i arhetipyi [The structure of the psyche and archetypes]. Moskva : Akademicheskiy proekt. [in Russian].
Iamnytskyi V.M. (2018). Zhyttievi perspektyvy akmeperiodu osobystosti v konteksti psykholohii zhyttietvorchosti [Life prospects of the acmeperiod of personality in the context of the psychology of life creation]. Psykholohichnyi chasopys - Psychological Journal, 6(16), 213-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2018.6.16.15
Dunn, M. J., Brinton, S., & Clark, L. (2010). Universal sex differences in online advertisers age preferences: Comparing data from 14 cultures and 2 religious groups. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(6), 383–393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.05.001
Giddens A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jaromowic M., A. Szuster. (2016). Self-We-Others Schemata Differentiation as a Base for Personal Agency and Social Attitudes. Frontiers in psychology, 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01227
Oldhem J.M., Morris L.B. (1990). The personality self-portret. New York. Toronto. London. Sydney. Auckland.
Stephen I.D, Perera T-M. (2014). Judging the differences between women’s attractiveness and health: Is there really a difference between judgments made by men and women? Body Image, 11(2), 183-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.11.007
Svendsen O.L., Hassager C., Christiansen C. (1995). Age- and menopause-associated variations in body composition and fat distribution in healthy women as measure by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Metabolism, 44(3), 369–373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-0495(95)90168-X
Yang X., Wang X., Zhang L., Weidman J. (2017). Gender role conflict, professional role confidence, and intentional persistence in engineering students in China. Studies in Higher Education, 42(2), 248–263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1045476
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Chyzhyk Kateruna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
