КРОС-КУЛЬТУРНА АДАПТАЦІЯ ТА СТАНДАРТИЗАЦІЯ ШКАЛИ СИМПТОМІВ МОРАЛЬНОЇ ТРАВМИ

Лариса Засєкіна; Марія Козігора

doi:10.29038/2227-1376-2022-39-zas

Authors

Larysa Zasiekina Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University
Mariia Kozihora Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2022-39-zas

Keywords:

moral traumatization, civilian population, traumatic experience, post-traumatic stress disorder.

Abstract

Purpose. The study aims to translate, culturally adopt and explore psychometric properties of Moral Injury Symptoms Scale – Military Version – Short Form (MISS-M-SF) in civilian population during war. Evidence consistently suggests, that moral injury was common among veterans and active duty military with PTSD symptoms. However, recent findings show that moral injury could occur in civilian population and professional staff, who are at high risk situations.

Methods. Teachers and students of Lutsk pedagogical college and teachers (n=111) from the program “State Support of Teachers during the War” were recruited via State Education Quality Assurance Service and participated in the study during 26 April-15 May 2022, mean age is 21,93±8.58, representatives of Volyn, Lviv and Rivne oblasts. The study applies the guidelines of WHO for translation and cultural adaptation of psychodiagnostic instruments and follows four stages, namely direct translation (3 translators, who are familiar with psychological terminology), group of experts for back translation (2 translators), pre-testing and cognitive interview, and the final version.

Results. Reliability was assessed through the internal consistency using Cronbach’s α= .70 (n = 111), and the test–retest reliability in 8 days, r=.67, p≤.01 (n=32). The study assesses discriminant validity of MISS-M-SF through association with PCL-5, which is r=.04 and MISS-M-SF through association with GAD-7, which is r=.07, p≥.05. Convergent validity is expressed by the correlation of MISS-M-SF and other measures of emotional distress, namely PQH (r=.28 p≤.05). Construct validity is in the range of 0,45-0,71. Descriptive statistics were performed to describe average and median scores, standard deviations (SD), and ranges on the MISS-M-SF and its individual items for which IBM SPSS Statistics, version 22, was used.

Conclusions. The obtained results indicate the cultural appropriateness and psychometric properties of MISS-M-SF, which allow to assess moral injury in civilian population during war.

References

Blanchard, E. B., Jones-Alexander, J., Buckley, T. C., & Forneris, C. A. (1996). Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist (PCL). Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34(8), 669–673.

Chesnut, R. P., Richardson, C. B., Morgan, N. R., Bleser, J. A., Perkins, D. F., Vogt, D., ... & Finley, E. (2020). Moral injury and social well‐being: a growth curve analysis. Journal of traumatic stress, 33(4), 587–597.

Currier, J. M., Holland, J. M., Drescher, K., & Foy, D. (2015). Initial psychometric evaluation of the Moral Injury Questionnaire—Military version. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 22(1), 54–63.

Epstein, E. G., Whitehead, P. B, Prompahakul, C, Thacker, L. R, Hamric A. B. (2019). Enhancing Understanding of Moral Distress: The Measure of Moral Distress for Health Care Professionals. J AJOB Empir Bioethics, 10(2), 113–24.

Fischer-Grönlund, C., & Brännström, M. (2021). The Swedish translation and cultural adaptation of the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP). BMC Medical Ethics, 22(1), 1–7.

Fontana, A., & Rosenheck, R. (2004). Trauma, change in strength of religious faith, and mental health service use among veterans treated for PTSD. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 192(9), 579–584.

Griffin, B. J., Purcell, N., Burkman, K., Litz, B. T., Bryan, C. J., Schmitz, M., Villierme, C., Walsh, J., & Maguen, S. (2019). Moral injury: An integrative review. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 32(3), 350–362.

Hutson, S. P., Hall, J. M., & Pack, F. L. (2015). Survivor Guilt. Advances in Nursing Science, 38(1), 20–33.

Koenig, H. G., Ames, D., Youssef, N. A., Oliver, J. P., Volk, F., Teng, E. J., ... & Pearce, M. (2018). Screening for moral injury: the moral injury symptom scale–military version short form. Military medicine, 183(11-12), e659–e665.

Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. (2001). The PHQ‐9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606–613.

Nash, W. P., Marino Carper T. L., Mills, M. A, Au, T., Goldsmith, A., Litz, B. T. (2013). Psychometric evaluation of the Moral Injury Events Scale. Mil Med, 178, 646–652.

Mantri, S., Lawson, J. M., Wang, Z., & Koenig, H. G. (2020). Identifying moral injury in healthcare professionals: The moral injury symptom scale-HP. Journal of Religion and Health, 59(5), 2323–2340.

Murthy, R. S., & Lakshminarayana, R. (2006). Mental health consequences of war: a brief review of research findings. World Psychiatry, 5(1), 25.

Shay, J., Munroe, J. (1998). Group and milieu therapy for veterans with complex posttraumatic stress disorder. In: Saigh PA, Bremner JD, editors. Posttraumatic stress disorder: comprehensive text. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 391–413.

Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B., & Löwe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(10), 1092–1097.

Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., Kaler, M. (2006). The Meaning in Life Questionnaire: assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 80-93.

Williams, N. (2014). The GAD-7 questionnaire. Occupational medicine, 64(3), 224–224.

World Health Organization. Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. 2020. https://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/-en/. Accessed 27 May 2020.

Zasiekina, L., Leshem, B., Hordovska, T., Leshem, N., & Pat-Horenczyk, R. (2021). Forgotten Stories of Women: Intergenerational Transmission of Trauma of Holodomor and Holocaust Survivors’ Offspring. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 8(1).

Zasiekina, L., & Zasiekin, S. (2020). Verbal Emotional Disclosure of Moral Injury in Holodomor Survivors. Psycholinguistics, 28(1), 41–58.