Psychological diagnosis of compatibility and cooperation in management teams

Authors

  • Аndrey Cherkassky Odessa National Technological University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2022-39-che

Keywords:

cohesion, common interests, psychological climate, interpersonal relations, team work, cooperation, common vision.

Abstract

Purpose. The article presents the results of an empirical study of compatibility and workability in management teams. The purpose of the article is to carry out a theoretical analysis and conduct an empirical study of compatibility and efficiency in management teams.

Methods. The study is based on the following methods: theoretical (problem analysis based on the study of scientific literature, systematization and generalization of information) and empirical - the study was conducted using the following methods: 16-factor personality questionnaire RB Kettel (16PF-questionnaire), characterological questionnaire of K. Leonhard and R. Shmishek, tests to assess the characteristics of team behavior and determine the desired management style, developed by prof. Yu. V. Sinyagin, "Lattice of the desired selection" (VV Kalinin, YV Sinyagin).

Results. The article conducts a thorough theoretical analysis of the concepts of "compatibility" and "operation", analyzes the semantic field, which uses the term compatibility, shows that its synonyms are often the following: psychological compatibility, efficiency, cohesion, common interests, conflict, psychological climate. It is noted that compatibility is mainly related to the sphere of interpersonal relations, and the concept of operation, which is often used in conjunction with compatibility, in contrast to the latter, concerns the consistency of the performance characteristics of the subjects. Because activity and interpersonal relationships are two interrelated aspects of a single process of interaction, sometimes work is seen as synonymous with compatibility. Particular emphasis is placed on the fact that compatibility - reflects the psychological unity of the subjects in the field of relations and is expressed in the highest possible positive assessment of each other and the relationship, one or more of their characteristics. Compatibility-incompatibility is closely related to the types of attitudes: sympathy, antipathy, indifference.

Efficiency is characterized by the maximum possible effectiveness of joint actions (activities) of entities in a particular area with relatively low psychophysiological costs to perform these actions (activities).

Conclusions. The conclusions state that the basis of "teamwork", above all, is the following: coincidence of basic psychological characteristics or their combination, which provides the best intra-team interaction; unanimity and shared vision (first of all, the goals of the team, the coincidence: the hierarchy of orientations on the tasks of activity, views on an acceptable management style and distance, both organizational and psychological); coincidence of the orientations of external and internal values.

References

Derkach A. A., Kalinin I. V., Sinjagin Ju. V. (1999). Strategija podbora i formirovanija upravlencheskoj komandy[Management team selection and formation strategy] M. : Izd-vo RAGS [in Russian].

Dolha H. V. (2018). Psykholohichni aspekty upravlinnya personalom: problemy teoriyi ta praktyky. [Psychological aspects of personnel management: problems of theory and practice]. Naukovyy zhurnal “Intelekt XXI” - Scientific journal "Intellect XXI", 2, 72.

Kapustina A. N. (2007). Mnogofaktornaja metodika R. Kettela [Multifactorial technique of R. Kettel]. SPb. : Rech' [in Russian].

Karelin A. A. (2009). Bol'shaja jenciklopedija psihologicheskih testov [Big encyclopedia of psychological tests]. M. : Jeksmo [in Russian].

Krichevskij R.L., Antonova I.B. (1980). Mezhlichnostnaja sovmestimost' v malyh gruppah. Psihologo-pedagogicheskie problemy obshhenija [Interpersonal compatibility in small groups. Psychological and pedagogical problems of communication]. M. [in Russian].

Letsyk D., Moroz L. (2021). Sotsial'no-psykholohichni aspekty upravlinnya trudovym potentsialom robitnyka. [Socio-psychological aspects of labor potential management of the worker] Nauchny vzhlyad v budushchee - Scientific view in the future, 2(17-02), 66–71.

Sinjagina Ju. V. (2009). Metodiki diagnostiki upravlencheskogo personala i latentnoj struktury organizacii: metodicheskoe posobie [ Methods for diagnosing managerial personnel and the latent structure of an organization: a methodological guide]. M. : Izd-vo RAGS [in Russian].

Obozov, N.N. (2000). Sovmestimost' i srabatyvaemost' ljudej [Compatibility and interoperability of people]. SPb. : Oblik [in Russian].

Obozov N. N. (1979). Mezhlichnostnye otnoshenija[Interpersonal relationships]. L.: Izdvo LGU [in Russian].

Sidorenkov A.V. (2012). Social'naja psihologija malyh grupp [Social psychology of small groups]. Rostov/n.Donu.:Feniks [in Russian].

Sinjagin Ju. V. (1996). Rukovoditel' organizacii i ego komanda (Teoreticheskaja model') [The head of the organization and his team (Theoretical model)]. M., Ul'janovsk [in Russian].

Smahtina T.A., Kubekova A.S. (2020). Osobennosti psihologicheskoj sovmestimosti u sotrudnikov [Features of psychological compatibility among employees]. Psihologija. Istoriko-kriticheskie obzory i sovremennye issledovanija - Psychology. Historical and critical reviews and modern research, 9 (6A), 96-103 [in Russian].

Sushyk I. V., Sushyk O. H. (2021) Moralno-psykholohichnyi ta psykhoemotsiinyi stan orhanizatsii yak pokaznyk yakosti menedzhmentu [Moral, psychological and psychoemotional state of the organization as an indicator of management quality]. Menedzhment ta pidpryiemnytstvo v Ukraini: etapy stanovlennia i problemy rozvytku - Management and entrepreneurship in Ukraine: stages of formation and problems of development, 2 (6): 106-120. https://doi.org/10.23939/smeu2021.02.106

Shcherbyna, I.Ie. (2016). Metodychni pidkhody do vyrishennia problemy psykholohichnoi sumisnosti [Methodical approaches to solving the problem of psychological compatibility]. Problemy ekstremalnoi ta kryzovoi psykholohii. Zb-k nauk. Prats - Problems of extreme and crisis psychology. Zb-k nauk. Works, 19, 258-269. [in Ukrainian].

Shcherbyna, I.Ie. (2016). Teoretychni aspekty vyznachennia fenomenu psykholohichnoi sumisnosti [Theoretical aspects of determining the phenomenon of psychological compatibility]. Ukrainskyi psykholohopedahohichnyi naukovyi zbirnyk. - Ukrainian psychological and pedagogical scientific collection, 9, 112-116. [in Ukrainian].

Leary T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality: a functional theory and methodology for personality evaluation. New York: Ronald Press Company.

Locke K. D. (2000). Circumplex scales of interpersonal values: reliability, validity, and applicability to interpersonal problems and personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75, 249–267.

Locke K. D. (2011). Circumplex measures of interpersonal constructs. Handbook of interpersonal psychology: theory, research, assesment and therapeutic interventions. New Jersey: Wiley, 313–324.

Pincus A. L., Ansell E. B. (2003). Interpersonal theory of personality. Handbook of psychology: personality and social psychology, 5, 209–229.

Carson R. C. (1969). Interpersonal behavior: history and practice of personality theory. Chicago: Adline Pub. Co.

Published

2022-05-31

How to Cite

Cherkassky А. . (2022). Psychological diagnosis of compatibility and cooperation in management teams. Psychological Prospects Journal, 39, 382–393. https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2022-39-che

Similar Articles

31-40 of 469

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.