Empirical Study of the Student’s Communicative-Speech Styles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2016-28-282-293Abstract
The article presents the results of empirical research of student’s communicativespeech styles. The percentiles of the distribution of data psycholinguistic markers to define groups of subjects, respectively, to the manifestation of different communicative speech styles have been determined. Based on the results of the analysis frequency, the maximum and minimum values of the parametric variables, and qualitative analysis of nonparametric variables have been allocated to 9 groups of subjects with a combined indirect, combined direct, combined elaborate, combined (direct/indirect, elaborat/succinct), direct elaborate, direct succinct, combined succinct, indirect succinct, indirect elaborate styles. To verify the reliability of the selected groups the procedure of discriminant analysis have been use. This analysis allowed us to solve two problems: to interpret the differences between the selected groups of subjects and to confirm the classification of the communicative-speech style depending on discriminating variables. Using data analysis canonical function of the group with the highest density of the object: combination (direct/indirect, elaborate/succinct), direct elaborate, direct succinct, indirect succinct, indirect elaborate have been allocated. The percentage distribution of the subjects in all groups has been graphically showed. Each of these styles differently correlated with styles of activities, emotional and motivational styles in the general personality style organization. Thus, the communicative-speech styles are inextricably linked to personal properties.
Keywords: communicative-speech style, psycholinguistic markers, percentile, discriminant analysis, personal characteristics.
References
Tsos Yu. A. Psykholohichni osoblyvosti stylovoyi orhanizatsiyi osobystosti studenta [Psychological peculiarities of the stylistic organization of the student’s personality] / Yu. A. Tsos // Aktualni problemy praktychnoyi psykholohiyi : zb. st. II Vseukr. nauk.-prakt. konf. (Hlukhiv, 12–13 lystop. 2015 r.) / M-vo osvity i nauky Ukrainy, HNPU im. О. Dovzhenka [ta in.] ; [redkol. : V. M. Polishchuk, O. Ye. Blinova, Ya. O. Hoshovsky ta in.] ; vidp. red. V. M. Polishchuk. – Hlukhiv : RVV HNPU im. O. Dovzhenka, 2015. – S. 171–176.
Abelson R. P. Conviction / R. P. Abelson // American Psychologist. – 1988. – Vol. 43. – P. 267–275.
Infante D. A. Enhancing the prediction of response to a communication from communication traits / D. A. Infante // Communication Quarterly. – 1987. – Vol. 35. – P. 308–316.
Gudykunst W. Culture and Interpersonal Communication / W. Gudykunst, S. Ting-Toomey, E. Chua. – Newbury Park, CA : Sage, 1988. – 278 р.
Mc Croskey Communication and personality: Trait perspectives. Cresskill / Mc. Croskey, J. C. Daly, J. A. Martin, M. M. & Beatty, M. J. (Eds.). – N. J. : Hampton Press, 1998. – 514 p.
Suzuki Sh. Gender-linked differences in informal argument: Analyzing arguments in an online newspaper // Women’s Studies in Communication. – 2006. – Vol. 29. – P. 193–219.
Suzuki Sh. Trait and Approaches to Explaining Argument Structures // Communication Quarterly. – 2011. – Vol. 59 (1). – P. 123–143.
Література:
Засєкіна Л. В. Мовленнєві стилі у новій парадигмі психолінгвістичного знання / Л. В. Засєкіна // Психолінгвістика. – 2012. – Вип. 9. – С. 48–55.
Цьось Ю. А. Психологічні особливості стильової організації особистості студента / Ю. А. Цьось // Актуальні проблеми практичної психології : зб. ст. ІІ Всеукр. наук.-практ. конф. (Глухів, 12–13 листоп. 2015 р.) / М-во освіти і науки України, ГНПУ ім. О. Довженка [та ін.] ; [редкол. : В. М. Поліщук, О. Є. Блінова, Я. О. Гошовський та ін.] ; відп. ред. В. М. Поліщук. – Глухів : РВВ ГНПУ ім. О. Довженка, 2015. – С. 171–176.
Abelson R. P. Conviction / R. P. Abelson // American Psychologist. – 1988. – Vol. 43. – P. 267–275.
Infante D. A. Enhancing the prediction of response to a communication from communication traits / D. A. Infante // Communication Quarterly. – 1987. – Vol. 35. – P. 308–316.
Gudykunst W. Culture and Interpersonal Communication / W. Gudykunst, S. Ting-Toomey, E. Chua. – Newbury Park, CA : Sage, 1988. – 278 р.
Mc Croskey Communication and personality: Trait perspectives. Cresskill / Mc. Croskey, J. C. Daly, J. A. Martin, M. M. & Beatty, M. J. (Eds.). – N. J. : Hampton Press, 1998. – 514 p.
Suzuki Sh. Gender-linked differences in informal argument: Analyzing arguments in an online newspaper // Women’s Studies in Communication. – 2006. – Vol. 29. – P. 193–219.
Suzuki Sh. Trait and Approaches to Explaining Argument Structures // Communication Quarterly. – 2011. – Vol. 59 (1). – P. 123–143.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Психологічні перспективи
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
