Ambiguous Loss In The Context OfForced Separation And Forced Adoption
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2023-42-rozKeywords:
forced displacement, assimilation, psychological absence, psychological trauma, attachment, grief, identity reconstruction, normalizing ambivalenceAbstract
Purpose. The article provides a theoretical overview of the theory of ambiguous loss in the focus of physical absence with the psychological presence of a loved one.
Methods. To achieve the purpose of the study, the methods of scientific theoretical study were used: analysis, synthesis, structuring, and generalization.
Results. Based on the analysis of research on the forced separation of children from their families and its psychological consequences, we can state that the theory of ambiguous loss is important in the situation of forced adoption of illegally displaced children. The theory of ambiguous loss clearly explains the mechanism of experiencing separation from a loved one, when this separation is not fully understood - there is no clear knowledge of the person's status: alive or dead, or the person is physically present but mentally absent, as in the case of dementia. The theory of ambiguous loss clearly explains three types of consequences: immobilization (affects the ability to communicate), consequences at the level of relationships (conflicts due to different views of the situation) and on the personality (manifestations of such conditions as depression, anxiety, guilt, etc.).
Conclusions. The model of finding resilience in the face of uncertain loss includes such interrelated structural blocks as finding meaning, tempering mastery, reconstructing identity, normalizing ambivalence, revising attachment and discovering hope. The experience of working with displaced children in El Salvador is also important, because of studying the «disappearance» and "reunification" stages. They formed the basis for adapting the model of resilience in ambiguous loss to study the psychological consequences of forced adoption. The prospects for further research are in the empirical study of the psychological consequences of the forced adoption traumatic situation for children and their families.
References
Report on Violations and Abuses of International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law, War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity, related to the Forcible Transfer and/or Deportation of Ukrainian Children to the Russian Federation (2023). Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. https://www.osce.org/odihr/542751
Abrams, M. S. (2001). Resilience in ambiguous loss. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 55(2), 283-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2001.55.2.283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2001.55.2.283
Barnert, E. S., Stover, E., Ryan, G., & Chung, P. (2015). Long journey home: Family reunification experiences of the disappeared children of El Salvador. Hum. Rts. Q., 37, 492-510. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2015.0028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2015.0028
Betz, G., & Thorngren, J. M. (2006). Ambiguous loss and the family grieving process. The Family Journal, 14(4), 359-365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480706290052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480706290052
Boss, P. (2010) The trauma and complicated grief of ambiguous loss. Pastoral psychology, 59, 137-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-009-0264-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-009-0264-0
Boss, P. (2004). Ambiguous loss research, theory, and practice: Reflections after 9/11. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(3), 551-566 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00037.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00037.x
Boss, P. (2006). Loss, trauma, and resilience: Therapeutic work with ambiguous loss. New York: Norton.
Boss, P. (2007). Ambiguous loss theory: Challenges for scholars and practitioners. Family relations, 56(2), 105-110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00444.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00444.x
Boss, P. (2016). The context and process of theory development: The story of ambiguous loss. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8, 268-286. https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/jftr.12152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12152
Boss, P. (2018). The Example of Ambiguous Loss. Approaches to Psychic Trauma: Theory and Practice, 91.
Boss, P., & Yeats, J. R. (2014). Ambiguous loss: A complicated type of grief when loved ones disappear. Bereavement Care, 33(2), 63-69 https://doi.org/10.1080/02682621.2014.933573 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02682621.2014.933573
Boss, P., Roos, S., & Harris, D. L. (2021). Grief in the midst of ambiguity and uncertainty: An exploration of ambiguous loss and chronic sorrow. In Grief and bereavement in contemporary society (pp. 163-175). Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003199762-16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003199762-16
Bretherton, I. (1992). The Origins of Attachment Theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth. Developmental Psychology, 28(5), 759-775. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.28.5.759 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.28.5.759
Dahl, C. M., & Boss, P. (2020). Ambiguous loss: Theory‐based guidelines for therapy with individuals, families, and communities. The handbook of systemic family therapy, 4, 127-151. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119438519.ch88 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119438519.ch88
Ellison, C. S., & Smith, A. (Eds.). (2012). Education and internally displaced persons. A&C Black. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472552914
Emina Ćerimović (2023) At risk and overlooked: Children with disabilities and armed conflict. International Review of the Red Cross , 105 (922), 192 – 216 https://doi.org/10.1017/S181638312200087X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S181638312200087X
Ferris, E., & Winthrop, R. (2010). Education and displacement: Assessing conditions for refugees and internally displaced persons affected by conflict. Background paper for the EFA Global Monitoring Report 2011. The hidden crisis: Armed conflict and education. https://www.humanitarianlibrary.org/sites/default/files/2014/02/190715e.pdf
Garrett, P. M. (2023). Bowlby, Attachment and the Potency of a ‘Received Idea’. The British Journal of Social Work, 53(1), 100-117. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcac091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcac091
Joshi, P. T., & Fayyad, J. A. (2015). Displaced children: The psychological implications. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics, 24(4), 715-730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2015.06.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2015.06.003
Kendzor, P., Kolesnyk, L. (2017). Educational and Socio-Psychological Needs of Internally Displaced Children in Ukraine. The New Education Review. Toruń, 50, 4. 36-47. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2017.50.4.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2017.50.4.03
Mata, C., & Pauen, S. (2023). The role of socio-cultural background and child age for parental regulation strategies and children's self-regulation: A comparison between Germany, Chile, and El Salvador. Acta Psychologica, 234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103871 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103871
Mutini, L. A., & Bakar, N. A. (2023). The Role Of Inclusive Schools In Developing Social Interactions Of Children With Special Needs (Autism). Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling (JPDK), 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-017-0814-6
Pauline, B., & Boss, P. (2009). Ambiguous loss: Learning to live with unresolved grief. Harvard University Press.
Pfefferbaum, B., Jacobs, A. K., Jones, R. T., Reyes, G., & Wyche, K. F. (2017). A skill set for supporting displaced children in psychological recovery after disasters. Current Psychiatry Reports, 19. https://doi.org/11007/s11920-017-0814-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-017-0814-6
Rhoades, A. (2010). Displaced futures: Internally displaced persons and the right to education. UN University for Peace. URL: ,https://inee.org/sites/default/files/resources/Rhoades%2C_A.pdf
Tatton, A. (2023). Using the theory of family boundary ambiguity and ambiguous loss to understand the experiences of foster carers’ own children. The British Journal of Social Work, 53(1), 198-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcac139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcac139
Van der Horst, F. C. (2011). John Bowlby-From psychoanalysis to ethology: Unravelling the roots of attachment theory. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119993100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119993100
Walsh, F., McGoldrick, M. (1998). A Family Systems Perspective on Loss, Recovery and Resilience. In: Sutcliffe, P., Tufnell, G., Cornish, U. (eds) Working with the Dying and Bereaved. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26222-9_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26222-9_1
Wiens, T. W., & Boss, P. (2005). Maintaining family resilience before, during and after military separation. In C. Castro, A. Adler, & T. Britt (Eds.), Military life: The psychology of serving in peace and combat (Vol. 3): The military family (pp. 13-38). Westport, CT: Praeger Security International.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Yuliia Rozmyrska, Iryna Hlova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
