Individual and psychological features of future psychologists’ target orientation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2019-34-107-118Keywords:
goal orientation, youth, purpose, altruistic position, rational position, self-centered position, psychological education.Abstract
This article presents a new theoretical and empirical consideration of student's goal orientationy with an emphasis on the role of psychological education in its development. Targeting in this research is addressed through features such as systematicity, resilience, hierarchy, and is related to the whole system of personality characteristics. Students were subjected to analysis such as: defining a goal by realizing what is to be achieved, predicting the way to achieve it, as well as the ability to subordinate actions and actions to a chosen goal, unwavering desire for it, which is manifested in the ability for a long time to maintain the goal and organize their behavior for its implementation. Positions of personality (egocentric, rational, altruistic) that accompany manifestations of target orientation of different degree (low, medium, high) are characterized. The egocentric position assumes satisfaction of biological and material needs, mercantile-utilitarian motivation. A rational position is to meet social needs, pragmatic and prestigious motivation. An altruistic position is defined as the satisfaction of spiritual needs in creative and internal motivation in accordance with the activities performed. Based on the analysis of the results of the development of the goal orientation of students' personality in different courses of study in the specialty psychology, it was found that the fourth year students have higher indicators of altruistic and rational position. They show a positive attitude towards themselves, others, understanding their needs and problems, desire to help, increasing emotional resistance to high and medium levels, positive shifts in accepting their own shortcomings, perceiving their own self-image, increasing their level of independence and organization, self-determination. in life, the development of the ability to set specific goals and their timely implementation, increasing the level of educational motivation.
References
2. Ball G. O. (2004). Do obgruntuvannya raciogumanisy`chnogo pidxodu u psy`xologiyi [To substantiation of the humanitarian approach in psychology]. Psy`xologiya i suspil`stvo. 4. 60–74.4. 60–74. [in Ukrainian].
3. Vasilyev Ya. V. (2007). Futurrealnaya psikhologiya lichnosti: Monografiya Nikolayev: Izd-vo «Ilion». 519 s. [in Russian].
4. Klochko V. E. (1979). Tseleobrazovaniye i dinamika otsenok v khode resheniya myslitelnykh zadach [Target formation and dynamics of assessments in the course of solving mental problems]. Psikhologicheskoye issledovaniye intellektualnoy deyatelnosti. Moskva: MGU. 87–95. [in Russian].
5. Kogan L. N. (1984). Tsel i smysl zhizni cheloveka [The purpose and meaning of human life]. Moskva: Mysl. 252 s. [in Russian].
6. Leontyev A. N. (2005). Deyatelnost. Soznaniye. Lichnost: uchebnoye posobiye [Activity. Consciousness. Personality: study guide]. Moskva Smysl. 352 s. [in Russian].
7. Maksymenko S. D. (2006). Geneza zdijsnennya osoby`stosti [Genesis of special features]. Ky`yiv: Vy`davny`cztvo «KMM». 255 s. [in Russian].
8. Molyako V.A. (1983). Psikhologiya resheniya shkolnikami tvorcheskikh zadach [Psychology of solving creative problems by schoolchildren]. Kiїv: Rad.shkola. 94 s. [in Russian].
9. Nikireyev E. M.(2007). Psikhologicheskiye osobennosti napravlennosti lichnosti: uchebnoye posobiye [Psychological characteristics of personality orientation: manual]. Moskva: Moskovskiy psikhologo-sotsialnyy institut. 172 s. [in Russian].
10. Ry`balka V. V. (2013) Formula osoby`stosti i personologichne my`slennya [Specialty Formula and Personnel Formula]. Psy`xologiya ta suspil`stvo. 4. 88–100. [in Ukrainian].
11. Rubinshteyn S. L. (1997). Chelovek i mir [Man and the world]. Moskva: Nauka. 191 s.
12. Sannikova O. P. (2013). Bagatovy`mirna koncepciya osoby`stosti [Multidimensional concept of personality]. Problemy` suchasnoyi psy`xologiyi. 1. 15–21. [in Russian].
13. Semichenko V. A. (2004). Problemy motivatsii povedeniya i deyatelnosti cheloveka [Problems of motivation of behavior and activity of the person]. K.: Millenium. 521 s. [in Russian].
14. Tytarenko T. M. (2004). Zhy`ttyevi domagannya osoby`stsoti: fenomenologichny`j ta strukturno-funkcional`ny`j pidxid [The structure of human mental activity]. Psy`xologiya i suspil`stvo. 4. 128–145. [in Ukrainian].
15. Tikhomirov O. K. (1969) Struktura myslitelnoy deyatelnosti cheloveka [Personality harassment of the individual: a phenomenological and structural-functional approach]. Moskva: MGU. 304 s. [in Russian].
16. Chebikіn O. Ya. (2008). Pro osnovnі komponenti ta mekhanіzmi proyavu emotsіynoї zrіlostі [On the main components and mechanisms of the manifestation of emotional maturity].. Naukoviy vіsnik PDPU іm. K. D. Ushinskogo. 12. 72–80. [in Ukrainian].
17. Shylova N. I. (2017). Rozvy`tok cil`ovoyi spryamovanosti osoby`stosti pidlitka u procesi tury`sty`chnoyi diyal`nosti: dy`s. kand. psy`xol. nauk. [Development of targeting of teenage personality in the process of tourist activity: PHd thesis]. Pivdennoukrayins`ky`j nacional`ny`j pedagogichny`j universy`tet im. K. D. Ushy`ns`kogo. Odesa. [in Ukrainian].
