ОСОБЛИВОСТІ КОПІНГ-СТРАТЕГІЙ У ЛЮДЕЙ З РІЗНИМИ ЦІННІСНИМИ ОРІЄНТАЦІЯМИ

Нігора Хазратова; Людмила Малімон; Алла Олійник

doi:10.29038/2227-1376-2023-41-kha

Authors

Nihora Khazratova Lviv Polytechnic National University
Ludmila Malimon Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University
Alla Olijnyk Lviv Polytechnic National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2023-41-kha

Keywords:

coping strategies, individualistic values, spiritual values, family values, social values

Abstract

Purpose is to present the results of a study of the peculiarities of choosing different coping strategies by people with different value orientations in the context of maintaining their own mental health and well-being.

Methods. The psychodiagnostic test methods of K. Thomas and M. Lazarus were used to identify coping strategies, and the test method of E. Pomytkin was used to diagnose values. Additionally, the Big Five personality test was used.

Results. The coping strategies most often used by people with different value orientations are revealed: with the dominance of spiritual values - to the strategies of distancing and avoidance, individualistic - to self-control and confrontation, social - to the search for social support, positive reassessment, family - to coping strategies of planning a solution to the problem and accepting responsibility.

It has been found that men, compared to women, more often choose the coping strategies of confrontation, avoidance, and compromise, the combination of which specifies the content of masculine gender roles in our culture. On the basis of cluster analysis, three types of coping strategies are distinguished: 1) "individualists" - holders of individualistic values who rely on themselves, are critical of others and practice the coping strategy of self-control; 2) "social optimists" - holders of social values who choose the strategy of social support; 3) "introverts" - holders of spiritual values who practice the coping strategies of distancing and avoidance, focus on themselves and do not focus on others. The carriers of family values are distributed in the first two clusters.

Conclusions. Representatives of different value orientations implement different coping strategies that correspond to their types of values: individualistic - confrontation and self-control, spiritual - avoidance and distancing, family - acceptance of responsibility and planning for problem solving, social - search for social support. Representatives of masculine gender roles are more likely to choose the coping strategies of confrontation, avoidance, and compromise. This suggests that different coping strategies can be effective for different people, and their choice depends on the value orientations of the individual.

References

Grabovs’ka S., Jesyp M. (2010). Problema kopingu w suchasnych psychologichnych doslidzenniach [The problem of coping in modern psychological researches]. Sociohumnitarni problemy ludyny. Psychologichne zdorow’ja osoby i suspilstwa – Socio-humanitarian problems of man. Psychological health of the individual and society, 4, 188-193. [in Ukrainian].

Al-Ruzzieh, M. A., & Ayaad, O. (2021). Work Stress, Coping Strategies, and Health-Related Quality of Life among Nurses at an International Specialized Cancer Center. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 22(9), 2995. https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.9.2995

Basogul, C., Baysan A., L., Mutlu Satıl, E., & Büyükbayram Aslan, A. (2021). Professional values and professional quality of life among mental health nurses: A cross-sectional study. Nursing & Health Sciences. 23(2), 362-371. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12811

Brannon, L., Feist, J. (2009). Personal Coping Strategies. Health Psychology: An Introduction to Behavior and Health (7th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning. 7, 121– 23.

Budimir, S., Probst, T., Pieh, C. (2021). Coping strategies and mental health during COVID-19 lockdown. Journal of Mental Health. 30(2), 156-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2021.1875412

Compas, B. E., Connor-Smith, J. K., Saltzman, H., Thomsen, A. H., & Wadsworth, M. E. (2001). Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: problems, progress, and potential in theory and research. Psychological bulletin, 127(1), 87–127.

Cramer P. (2000). Defense mechanismus and Coping strategies: What’s the difference? American Psychologist. June, 638–646.

Heszen-Niejodek I. (2002). Emocje, ocena poznawcza i strategie w prozasie radzenie sobie Teoretyczne i kliniczne problemy radzenia sobie ze stresem. Poznań: Stowarzyszenie Psychologia i Architektura, S. 174–197.

Hobfoll S. (2006). Conservation of resources. URL: http://www.wfnetwork.bc.edu/…_enty.php?id=4191&area=academic

Lazarus R., Folkman S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York: Springer.

Miller P., Ingham J., Davidson S. (1986). Live events, symptoms and social support Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 20, 515–522.

Moss R., Schaeffer J. (1986). Life transitions and crises. Coping with life crises. An integrative approach. New York.

Muniandy, M., Richdale, A. L., Arnold, S. R., Trollor, J. N., & Lawson, L. P. (2022). Associations between coping strategies and mental health outcomes in autistic adults. Autism Research. 15(5), 929-944.

Pargament K. (1997). The Psychology of Religion and Coping: Theory, research, practice. New York.

Pargament, K., Koenig, H., Perez, L. (2000). The many methods of religious coping: Development and initial validation of the RCOPE Journal of Clinical Psychology. 56 (4), 519–543. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(200004)56:4<519::aid-jclp6>3.0.co;2-1

Pearlin, L., Shooler, C. (1978). The Structure of Coping The Jornal of health and Social behavior. 19(1), 2–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136319

Roesch, S., Weiner, B. (2001). A meta-analytic review of coping with illness: Do causal attributions matter? Journal of Psychosomatis Research. 50, 205-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3999(01)00188-x