Peculiarities of personality space organization of servicemen with PTSD signs

Authors

  • Victor Koshyrets Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University
  • Kateryna Shkarlatyuk Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2020-36-124-143

Keywords:

personality space, psychological space sovereignty, servicemen, traumatic event, PTSD, mental health

Abstract

Purpose. The article deals with the peculiarities of personality space organization of servicemen with posttraumatic stress disorder signs. The main directions and approaches to the study of the psychological space concept as well as the impact of traumatic events on personality space organization as a component of a living space structure are identified. Theoretical grounding of the concept of personality space of servicemen is carried out and its psychological peculiarities are empirically studied. Methods. The standardized psychodiagnostic methods "Sovereignty of psychological space" by Nartova-Bochaver, the Patient Health Questionnaire ( PHQ) -9, the posttraumatic stress disorders screening questionnaire (PTSD SQ), the Impact of Event Scale–Revised (IES-R) are used. Results. It has been determined that sovereignty levels of space, body, social relations, things, and values are associated with the appearance of PTSD signs among servicemen. The conducted research allows to ascertain psychological features among servicemen with PTSD signs that negatively affect their daily lives, the processes of adaptation, resocialization, and organization of their personalality space. The low level of psychological space sovereignty shows signs of deprivation, which is manifested in the experience of subordination, alienation, fragmentation of own life and is characterized by difficulties in finding environment objects with which people identify themselves. Conclusions. The research showed that indicators of predisposition to posttraumatic stress disorder are clearly expressed among servicemen with the low level of psychological space sovereignty. That is, the low sovereignty of space, body, social connections, things, and values affects the probability of PTSD signs occurrence among servicemen. The similar relationship is found out between the level of sovereignty and the tendency presence to PTSD: those servicemen who have high level of psychological space sovereignty do not have the pronounced signs of posttraumatic stress disorder. The importance of solving the rehabilitation tasks, early diagnoses and psychocorrection of servicemen to ensure their mental health, as well as for the development of their personality and professional self-realization is demonstrated.

Author Biography

References

Aleksandrov E. O. (2005). Integrativnaya psihoterapiya posttravmaticheskogo stressovogo rasstroystva [Integrative psychotherapy of posttraumatic stress disorder]. Novosibirsk: Sibprint. [in Russian].

Golovaha E. I., Kronik A. A. (2008). Psihologicheskoe vremya lichnosti [Psychological time of a pesonality]. Moskva: Smyisl. [in Russian].

Dzheyms Uilyam (2016). Psihologiya [Psychology]. Moskva: Ripol Klassik [in Russian].

Koshyrets V.V. (2017). Osoblyvosti nadannia psykholohichnoi dopomohy osobam z PTSR [Peculiarities of providing psychological assistance to persons with PTSD]. Psykholohiia: realnist i perspektyvy: zbirnyk naukovykh prats Rivnenskoho humanitarnoho universytetu, 8, 128-133 [in Ukrainian].

Koshyrets V.V. (2016). Suverennist psykholohichnoho prostoru molodoi liudyny v konteksti stanovlennia yii osobystisnoi zrilosti [Psychological space sovereignty of a young person in the context of personal maturity becoming]. Psykholohichni perspektyvy: zb. nauk. pr. Skhidnoievropeiskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Lesi Ukrainky, 28, 151-164 [in Ukrainian].

Levin Kurt (2016). Teoriya polya v sotsialnyih naukah [Field theory in social sciences]. Moskva: Akademicheskiy proekt, 316 p. [in Russian].

Matiash M. M. (2014). Ukrainskyi syndrom: osoblyvosti posttravmatychnoho stresovoho rozladu v uchasnykiv antyterorystychnoi operatsii [Ukrainian syndrome: peculiarities of posttraumatic stress disorder among the anti-terrorist operation participants]. Ukrainskyi medychnyi chasopys. Aktualni pytannia klinichnoi praktyky, 6, 124-127 [in Ukrainian].

Nartova-Bochaver S. K. (2014). Novaya versiya oprosnika «Suverennost psihologicheskogo prostranstva-2010» [New version of «Psychological space sovereignty-2010» questionnaire]. Psihologicheskiy zhurnal, 35, 3, 105–119 [in Russian].

Nartova-Bochaver S. K. (2008). Chelovek suverennyiy: psihologicheskoe issledovanie sub'ekta v ego byitii [The sovereign man: psychological study of the subject in his being]. SPb.: Piter [in Russian].

Uaynhold Berri, Uaynhold Dzheney (2019). Osvobozhdenie ot sozavisimosti [Release from codependency]. Moskva: Klass. [in Russian].

Bleich A., Koslowsky M., Dolev A., Lerer B. (1997). Posttraumatic stress disorder and depression: an analysis of comorbidity. Brit. J. Psychiatry, 170, 479–482.

Calhoun P. S., Beckham J. C., Bosworth H. B. (2002). Caregiver burden and psychological distress in partners of veterans with chronic posttraumatic stress disorder. J. Trauma Stress, 15, 3, 205–212.

Figley C. R. (1985). Traumatic stress: the role of the family and social support system. Trauma and Its Wake, Volume II: The Study and Treatment of PosttTraumatic Stress Disorder. – New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1985, 39–54.

Kessler R. C. (1995). Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry, 52, 1048–1060.

McFall M. E., Mackay P. W., Donovan D. M. (1992). Combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder and severity of substance abuse in Vietnam veterans. J. Stud. Alcohol, 53, 4, 357–363.

Published

2020-12-30 — Updated on 2020-12-30

Versions

How to Cite

Koshyrets, V. ., & Shkarlatyuk, K. (2020). Peculiarities of personality space organization of servicemen with PTSD signs. Psychological Prospects Journal, 36, 124-143. https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2020-36-124-143

Similar Articles

31-40 of 522

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.