The phenomenon of ostracism in the system of transcendental concepts of life form
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2019-34-155-174Keywords:
transcendentalism, fundamental situation, ostracism, ostracizer, social isolation, social status, multi-motivic theory, belonging.Abstract
In the article, the authors make an attempt to determine the features of the phenomenon of social isolation in the system of fundamental concepts and systematize the socio-psychological, philosophical ideas about alienation as a mechanism of ostracization in the group. Special attention is paid to the consideration of the personality system as a whole, autonomous from the nature of education, which functions according to its own specific social laws, and from the point of view of the identification of the personality as part of a more complex whole.
The article is devoted to the importance of analyzing the basic transcendental factors of life form that influence the course of personal life of individuals and social groups, the primary factor of existential needs, which is most clearly manifested in the social interaction of the individual when she creates something fundamentally new from birth. In this case, quite often, without realizing, the regularity and motives of their actions, reactions, behavioral scenarios.
The features of the reflexive reactions and responses of the individual to ostracism, such as: disinterest, criticism, prejudice, avoidance, rejection, betrayal, stigmatization, neglect, abandonment, resentment, intimidation, are highlighted. And various minor insults, and insults that have a general impact on emotions, self-esteem and behavior.
The role of social status, self-esteem of personality, social affiliation, and characteristic features of endogenous factors, which can cause the risk that an unaccepted person maneuvers because of his distorted perception in a situation where the way out of isolation using its own capabilities is practically is impossible.
The conclusions are made in the system of consideration of the concept of ostracism, that at the deep cognitive-emotional level it influences the actual fundamental situation of the personality, violating the satisfaction of the basic features of the transcendental concepts of the life form.
Further consideration of this problem is provided in a more detailed study of the effect of ostracism on other fundamental categories of life form. And the study of individual personality traits that affect the departure of the individual, who is a discharge, from social exclusion.
References
2. Zharov SN (2007). Transtsendentne v ontolohichnykh strukturakh filosofiyi i nauky. [Transcendent in the ontological structures of philosophy and science.] author's abstract dis for the sciences. degree doc. Philosophy Sciences 40 s. [in Russian].
3. Kuvshinova A.O. (2009). Lyudy i chas: konflikt pokolenitsy v dzerkali sotsialʹnoyi zlahody. [People and time: the conflict is rampant in the mirror of social harmony]. Tyumen: The printing press. 319 s. [in Ukrainian].
4. Lavrukhina I. M. (2009). Ideya transtsendentnoho: kontseptualʹni versiyi v kulʹturi. [The idea of transcendental: conceptual versions in culture.] author's abstract dis for the sciences. degree doc. Philosophy Sciences., 42 s. [in Russian].
5. Popova Ye.I. (2014). Spetsyfika zhorstokoho povodzhennya z ditʹmy v shkilʹnomu seredovyshchi. [Specificity of ill-treatment of children in the school environment.] Scientific and methodical electronic journal "Concept", 6, 106 - 110 [in Ukrainian].
6. Raza D. N. (2009). Teleolohichnyy pryntsyp v nautsi (transtsendentalʹnyy pidkhid). [The teleological principle in science (transcendental approach).] author's abstract dis for the sciences. degree doc. Philosophy Sciences, 32 p. [in Russian].
7. Roman V.P. (2008). Nauka i filosofiya: klasychni, neklasychni i postneklasychni paradyhmy. [Science and philosophy: classical, non-classical and post-classical paradigms.] Belgorod: CPI "POLITERRA", 451s. [in Russian].
8. Baumeister RF, DeWall CN, Ciarocco NL, Twenge JM. (2006). Social exclusion impairs self-regulation. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 88:589-604 [in English].
9. Buckley KE, Winkel RE, Leary MR. (2004). Reactions to acceptance and rejection: Effects of level and sequence of relational evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 14–28 [in English].
10. Downey G, Mougios V, Ayduk O, London B, Shoda Y. (2004). Rejection sensitivity and the defensive motivational system: insights from the startle response to rejection cues. Psychol. Sci, 15, 668-773 [in English].
11. Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302, 290-292 [in USA].
12. Hardin CD, Conley TD. (2001). A relational approach to cognition: Shared experience and relationship affirmation in social cognition. Cognitive social psychology,203, 3–21 [in English].
13. Leary MR, MacDonald G. (2003). Individual differences in self-esteem: A review and theoretical integration. Guilford Press, 105, 401–418 [in English].
14. MacDonald G, Leary MR. (2005). Why does social exclusion hurt? The relationship between social and physical pain. Psychol. Bull, 131, 202-223.
15. Nicholson, R. A. (2012). Review of social isolation: an important but underassessed condition in older adults. Prim Prev, 33, 137–152.
16. Paolo Parigi and Warner Henson II. (2014). Social Isolation in America. Rev. Sociol, 40, 53–71.
17. Patti M. Joseph B. (2016). Media Effects: Theory and Research. Rev. Psychol, 67, 315–388.
18. Pickett CL, Gardner WL. (2005). The social monitoring system: enhanced sensitivity to social clues as an adaptive response to social exclusion. Personal. Soc. Psychol, 45, 21-26.
19. Twenge JM, Baumeister RF, Tice DM, Stucke TS. (2001). If you can’t join them, beat them: effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. Personal. Soc. Psychol, 81, 1058-1069.
