Psychological Peculiarities of Factors of Personal and Interpersonal Functioning of Family Members with Problem Children on the Basis of Family Status
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2019-34-137-154Keywords:
full family, incomplete family, problematic child, personal factors, interpersonal factors.Abstract
The article presents an empirical study of personal and interpersonal factors of family members with problematic children on the criteria of family status - full or incomplete family. By means of standardized methods for studying accentuations of personality character, personality traits, parental attitude, analysis of family relationships and statistical analysis, the average values of factors of personal and interpersonal functioning of family members with problem children are determined; their significant differences in the levels of expression of the selected factors are highlighted. It is emphasized that representatives from incomplete families, compared to full families, are more likely to profess a patronizing strategy of raising a child with elements of high protection. It has been determined that incomplete family members, unlike full family members, have a higher risk of hypochondriacal attitudes towards the child. It is proven that representatives of incomplete families, more than representatives of full families, are characterized by extraverted personal disposition and exhibit a high degree of determination, independence, energy, independence, demonstrativeness, self-centeredness, openness to socializing with people, extraversion. It has been established that members of incomplete families are more characterized by persistence, initiative, commitment, ingenuity, activity, and pronounced organizational skills. It is stated that they, more than members of complete families are characterized by superficiality, inability to focus on a particular case or thought for a long time, constant turmoil, jumping from one case to another, disorganization, light-heartedness, readiness for negligent risk, complete inconsistence of behaviour, dependence on others and the lack of volitional control in regulating one's behaviour.
References
2. Antonov A. I., Medkov V. M. (1996). Sotsiologiya semyi [Sociology of the family]. Moskva: Izd-vo MHU. 304 s. [in Russian].
3. Bodalev A. A., Stolin V. V. (2000) Obshchaia psykhodiagnostika [General psychodiagnosis]. Sankt–Peterburg: Rech. 440 s. [in Russian].
4. Byuyul A. (2002). SPSS: Iskusstvo obrabotki informatsii: analiz statisticheskikh dannyh i vosstanovleniye skryitykh zakonomernosteyi [SPSS: the art of information processing: analysis of statistical data and the restoration of hidden patterns]. Sankt–Peterburg: OOO «DiaSoftYuG». 608 s. [in Russian].
5. Varga A. Ya. (2011). Vvedenie v sistemnuyu semeinuyu psikhoterapiyu (2-e izd. stereotipnoe) [Introduction to Systemic Family Psychotherapy (2nd ed. Stereotyped)]. Moskva: Kogito-Tsentr. 240 s. [in Russian].
6. Glozman Zh. M. (2018). Neiropsihologiya detskogo vozrasta [Pediatric Neuropsychology]. Moskva: Izdatelstvo Yurait. 249 s. [in Russian].
7. Egides A. (2002). Kak razbiratsia v liudiah, ili Psikhologicheskiy risunok lichnosti [How to understand people, or a psychological drawing of personality]. Moskva: AST-Press. 94 s. [in Russian].
8. Emishiants O. B. (2013). Psykholohichni osoblyvosti samoaktualizatsiyi osobystosti v zalezhnosti vid typu simyi: povnoyi/nepovnoyi [Psychological peculiarities of self-actualization of specialties in the type of SIM: secondary / non-continuous]. Kyiv: Lohos, 2013. S. 131. [in Ukrainian].
9. Zhmurov V. A. (2012). Bolshaya entsiklopediya po psihiatriyi [Great Encyclopedia of Psychiatry]. Elista: Dzhangar. 864 s. [in Russian].
10. Kostiv V. (2001). Sotsialno-pedahohichni osnovy vykhovannia ditei v suchasniy nepovniyi simyi [Social and pedagogical foundations of whirlwind children in extreme disabilities]. Visnyk Prykarpatskoho universytetu, 5, 154–164. [in Ukrainian].
11. Lutsenko O. L. (2016). Fraiburzkyi osobystisnyi opytuvalnyk FPI – perevirka validnosti ta lokalna standartyzatsiya [FPI Freiburg personal questionnaire - validation and local standardization]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina, 61, 49–54. [in Ukrainian].
12. Mateichek Z. (1980). Nekotoryie psykhologicheskiye problemy vospitaniya detey v nepolnoy semye [Some psychological problems of raising children in single-parent families]. Vospytanye detei v nepolnoi seme, 70–85. [in Russian].
13. Moliako V. O. (2017). Robocha kontseptsiya stratehichnoho ta taktychnoho podolannia kryzovykh naukovo-osvitnikh problem (psykholohichni rakursy) [Working concept of strategic and tactical overcoming of crisis scientific and educational problems (psychological perspectives)mily]. Aktualni problemy psykholohiyi: zb. nauk. prats Instytutu psykholohii imeni H.S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy, 23, 6–12. [in Ukrainian].
14. Nasledov A. D. (2004). Matematicheskiye metody psihologicheskogo issledovaniya: analiz i interpretatsiya dannyh [Mathematical methods of psychological research: analysis and interpretation of data]. Sankt–Peterburg: Rech. 392 s. [in Russian].
15. Slobodianiuk I. A., O. O. Kholodova, O. I. Oleksenko (1996). Psykholoho-pedahohichna dopomoha ditiam z aktsentuatsiyamy kharakteru [Psychological and pedagogical assistance to children with character accents]. Vinnytsia: B v. 52 s. [in Ukrainian].
16. Chuiko L. V. (1975). Braki i razvody [Marriages and divorces]. Moskva: Statistika. 176 s. [in Russian].
17. Eidemiller E. G., Yustitskis V. Yu. (1999). Psihologiya i psihoterapiya semyi [Family psychology and psychotherapy]. Sankt–Peterburg: Pyter. 656 s. [in Russian].
18. Bowen M. (1978). Family Therapy in Clinical Practice. New York, Jason Aronson. 565 r. [in English].
