Psychological features of communicative tolerance at different stages of teacher’s professional life

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2023-41-koz

Keywords:

communicative tolerance, teacher, professional life, personal characteristics, professional environment, rigidity, set

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to determine the level of teacher’s communicative tolerance at different stages of one’s professional development and its features: the ability to be flexible and the study of communicative sets.

Methods. The basis of the research was an ascertaining experiment with the use of diagnostic tools, which included: Method of the communicative sets diagnosis according to V.V. Boyko, Method of the communicative tolerance diagnosis (according to V.V. Boyko), Rigidity test.

Results. An empirical study of the teachers’ communicative tolerance at different stages of their professional life showed that during the period of adaptation, teachers are characterized with high communicative tolerance and low rigidity, and negative personal experience of communication with others, a tendency to make unfounded generalizations of negative facts in the sphere of relations with partners appears in the communicative sets and  observations of social reality. In the period of professional realization, teachers are characterized with a medium and low level of communicative tolerance, the level of rigidity increases, and the disguised cruelty regarding the people, in judgments about them is dominated in the communicative sets. In the period of stagnation, teachers have a low level of communicative tolerance, an average and high level of rigidity regarding their reconsideration of professional life. At this stage, a negative personal experience of communication with others appears in communicative sets.

Conclusions. The level of communicative tolerance and its features change at different stages of the teachers' professional activity. In the period of adaptation, communicative tolerance is at high level, and it is comfortable to carry out joint activities with such persons, they communicate with a friendly manner, aimed at good relations with others, they respect another person. During this period, teachers are able to change their interests and attitudes in accordance with changes in the partners’ behavior. The negative personal experience of communication with others, a tendency to make unfounded generalizations of negative facts in the sphere of relations with partners appears in the communicative sets and observations of social reality.

During the period of professional implementation, communicative tolerance is at an average and low level. At this stage of professional life, the level of rigidity increases that shows an inability to change interests and attitudes, which are aimed at defending one's opinion and an active position, which increases and prevents the construction of adequate interaction and relationship with others under the influence of external forces. At this stage of professional life, disguised cruelty regarding the people, in judgments about them, prevails in the communicative sets.

During the period of professional stagnation, the level of communicative tolerance is low, however, some people have a high level of communicative tolerance, and it is explained by the fact that for these individuals, professional stagnation turns into the assimilation of professional techniques and technologies aimed at self-improvement and self-development. The level of rigidity increases, that appears in conflict, affective enthusiasm for the dominant idea, which prevents the establishment of interaction with others. In the communicative sets, the negative personal experience of communication with others is most evident, and it is logical considering the work experience and the peculiarity of interaction.

References

Aheieva, Z. (2012). Komunikatyvna tolerantnist yak element komunikatyvnoi kompetentnosti osobystosti [Communicative tolerance as an element of a person's communicative competence]. Visnyk Ivanivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia «Pryrodnychi, suspilni nauky» – Bulletin of Ivanovo State University. Series "Natural, social sciences", 1, 49-53 [in Ukrainian].

Briukhovetska, O. V. (2016). Funktsii profesiinoi tolerantnosti kerivnykiv zahalnoosvitnikh navchalnykh zakladiv [Functions of professional tolerance of heads of general educational institutions]. Instytutsionalni peretvorennia v suspilstvi – Institutional transformations in society: world experience and Ukrainian reality, 5-8. [in Ukrainian].

Vynoslavska, O.V. (2004). Etyko-psykholohichni problemy profesiinoi diialnosti naukovo-pedahohichnykh pratsivnykiv vyshchoi shkoly [Ethical and psychological problems of the professional activity of scientific and pedagogical workers of a higher school]. Psykholohichnyi resurs prostoru vyshchoi osvity – Psychological resource of the space of higher education, 1, 29-39 [in Ukrainian].

Haiduk, H.A. (2015). Profesiina tolerantnist osobystosti: ohliad teoretychnykh pozytsii vyvchennia fenomenu [Professional tolerance of personality: revive of theoretical positions of studying of the phenomenon]. Problemy humanitarnykh nauk - Problems of humanitarian sciences, 35, 49-60. [in Ukrainian].

Zarytska, V. V., Lapa, V. M. (2017). Struktura komunikatyvnoi tolerantnosti: analiz naukovykh pidkhodiv.[Structure of communicative tolerance: analysis of scientific approaches]. Molodyi vchenyi – Young scientist, 2 (42), 77-80 [in Ukrainian].

Lapa, V. M. (2016). Naukovi pidkhody do vyznachennia poniattia “komunikatyvna tolerantnist” [Scientific approaches to the definition “communicative tolerance”]. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia: Psykholohichni nauky – Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Series: Psychological sciences, 6(2), 61-65 [in Ukrainian].

Haiduk, H. A. (2019). Motyvatsiino-smyslovi chynnyky profesiinoi tolerantnosti pedahoha [Motivational-semantic factors of professional teacher's tolerance]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Lutsk: Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University [in Ukrainian].

Skok, A. H. (2007). Komunikatyvna tolerantnist vykladacha vyshchoho navchalnoho zakladu [The Communicative Tolerance of the Higher Educational Establishment Teacher]. Visnyk Zhytomyrskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Franka – Bulletin of Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University, 34, 79-84 [in Ukrainian].

Shevenko, A. M. (2016). Metodychne zabezpechennia vidboru uchnivskoi molodi do vyshchykh navchalnykh zakladiv pedahohichnoho profiliu. [Methodological support of the selection of young students to higher educational institutions of a pedagogical profile]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple Intelligences: The Theory in Practice. New York: Basic Books.

Griffiths, C., İnceçay, G. (2016). Styles and Style-Stretching: How are They Related to Successful Learning?. Journal of Psycholinguist Research, 45, 599–613 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9366-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9366-2

Muharib, R., Correa, V. I., Wood, C. L., Haughney, K. L. (2019). Effects of functional communication training using GoTalk Now iPad application on challenging behavior of children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Special Education Technology, 34, 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434187834 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643418783479

Muharib, R., & Pennington, R. C. (2019). My Student Cannot Wait! Teaching Tolerance Following Functional Communication Training. Beyond Behavior, 28(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074295619852106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1074295619852106

Scopa, C., & Palagi, E. (2016). Mimic me while playing! Social tolerance and rapid facial mimicry in macaques ( Macaca tonkeana and Macaca fuscata ). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 130(2), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000028

Sumter, M.E., Gifford, M.R., Tiger, J.H., Effertz, H.M. and Fulton, C.J. (2020). Providing noncontingent, alternative, functional reinforcers during delays following functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53, 2319-2329. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.708 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.708

Published

2023-06-01

How to Cite

Kozak, H. (2023). Psychological features of communicative tolerance at different stages of teacher’s professional life. Psychological Prospects Journal, 41, 108-119. https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2023-41-koz

Similar Articles

41-50 of 497

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.