Psychological features of application of non-normative vocabulary in interpersonal communication

Authors

  • Olena Dysa Oles Honchar Dnipro National University
  • Artem Chumak Oles Honchar Dnipro National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2022-39-dus

Keywords:

normative speech, obscene language, culture of oral speech, non-normative speech constructs, interpersonal communication.

Abstract

Purpose. The article considers the problem of using profane language in modern society, highlights the socio-psychological factors that contribute to the violation of the normative speech. It is noted that the uncontrolled flow of obscene language can be "activated" in an era of global historical turmoil and social instability. During the Russian-Ukrainian war, there was a linguistic and psychological imbalance between normative and non-normative vocabulary in the country (military conflicts, revolutions, threats of state collapse, economic crisis, etc.). The heterogeneity and multifunctionality of the researched issue are emphasized, those are both relevant and difficult to analyze at the present stage.

The results of an empirical study of the peculiarities of the use of profanity by students of higher education institutions are presented.

Methods. In this paper, methods of questionnaires and psychodiagnostics were used. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to establish differences between groups and correlation analysis using the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

Results. Psychological factors have been identified that determine the tendency to use obscene words in interpersonal communication. It is shown that a certain level of communicative abilities, aggression, reflection, social self-control, flexibility, speech anxiety and interpersonal emotional maturity differently affect the possibility of using profanity by students in the process of interpersonal communication. Relationships between verbal aggression and flexibility, independence, and interpersonal emotional maturity have been identified.

Conclusions. The specifics of interpersonal communication is not a monolithic structure, it is multifunctional and dynamic. The results show that non-normative lexicon are served as a psychological instrument that is actively used in interpersonality communication, but by not everybody, and in most cases stipulated by a situation and individually-psychological features of personality. Non-normative speech constructs used in interpersonal communication may be perceived differently depending on the context and situation, and will not necessarily characterize the speaker as an uneducated and uncultured person. The results obtained by us significantly expand and supplement the existing research on the norms and culture of speech, which involves compliance with the norms of language, grammatical and stylistic rules, the appropriate use of speech constructions and more.

References

Bahan, M., Navalna, M., & Istomina, A. (2022). Indyvidualni verbalni kody spontannoi emotsiinoi psykhorehuliatsii suchasnoi ukrainskoi molodi [Individual verbal codes of spontaneous emotional psychoregulation of modern Ukrainian youth]. Psycholinguistics, 31(2), 6-32 [in Ukrainian].

Harlytska, T. S. (2018). Formuvannia movnoho otochennia mista pid vplyvom linhvokulturnykh ta sotsialno-psykholohichnykh chynnykiv [Formation of the urban language environment under the influence of linguistic, cultural and socio-psychological factors]. Naukovi zapysky – Proceedings, 164, 12–16 [in Ukrainian].

Kalmykov, H. (2020). Yak bakalavry psykholohii zdiisniuiut refleksiiu nad profesiinym movlenniam: stan rozvytku dyskursyvnoi refleksyvnosti [How bachelors of psychology reflect on professional speech: The State of Development of Discursive Reflexivity]. Psycholinguistics, 27(1), 139-163 [in Ukrainian].

Kalmykova, L., Kharchenko, N., Volzhentseva, I., Kalmykov, H., & Mysan, I. (2020). Aktualizatsiia problematyky vnutrishnoho movlennia v psykholinhvistytsi komunikatsii: rezultaty systematychnoho ohliadu i metaanalizu [Actualization of the problems of internal speech in the psycholinguistics of communication: the results of a systematic review and meta-analysis]. Psycholinguistics, 28(1), 83-148 [in Ukrainian].

Makarets, J. (2021). Psykholinhvistychna pryroda movnoi normy ta yii mistse sered chynnykiv movlennievoi diialnosti [Psycholinguistic nature of the language norm and its place among the factors of speech activity]. Psycholinguistics, 29(2), 151-172 [in Ukrainian].

Malysheva, M. H. (2020). Vyrazhennia verbalnoi ahresii v komentariakh sotsmerezhi Facebook [Expressions of verbal aggression in the comments of the Facebook social network]. Visnyk Odeskoho natsionalnoho universytetu – Bulletin of Odessa National University, 2, 58–62 [in Ukrainian].

Mezhov, O., Navalna, M., Kostusiak, N. (2021). Zasoby vyrazhennia komunikatyvno-prahmatychnoi intentsii obrazy v suchasnykh mediatekstakh [Means of expression of communicative-pragmatic intention of offense in modern media texts]. Linhvistychni studii – Linguistic studies, 41, 179–192 [in Ukrainian].

Tavrovetska, N. I., Shebanova, V. I. (2020). Kros-kulturne doslidzhennia vzhyvannia obstsennoi leksyky u molodizhnomu seredovyshchi [Cross-cultural study of the use of obscene language in youth]. Psycholinguistics, 28, 239–266 [in Ukrainian].

Turchak, O. M. (2014). Doslidzhennia yakisnykh i kilkisnykh pokaznykiv movlennievoi tryvozhnosti v usnomu movlenni studentiv u sytuatsiiakh emotsiinoi napruhy [Research of qualitative and quantitative indicators of speech anxiety in students' oral speech in situations of emotional stress]. Psycholinguistics, 7, 143–151 [in Ukrainian].

Talko, O. B., Shevchenko, O. M. (2017). Psykholoho-kulturolohichni aspekty vzhyvannia nenormatyvnoi leksyky u molodizhnomu seredovyshchi [Psychological and cultural aspects of the use of profanity in the youth environment]. Molodyi vchenyi – Young scientist, 3 (43), 280-283 [in Ukrainian].

Andang, K., Bram, B. (2018). Swear words and their implications for English language learning-teaching. LLT journal, 21, 43-49.

Babushko, S., Solovei, L. (2019). What makes university students swear. Advanced Education, 13, 112-119. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.159259

Droessiger, H. H. (2017). On evaluative conceptualizations of swear words and invectives. Athens journal of philology, 4(3), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajp.4.3.2

Finn, E. (2017). Swearing: The good, the bad & the ugly. Ortesol journal, 34, 17-26.

Formanova, S., & Dombrovan, T. (2019). A sociolinguistic experiment in defining the forms of impoliteness. Psycholinguistics, 25(2), 323-337. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2019-25-2-323-337

Jay, T. (2018). Swearing, moral order, and online communication. Journal of language aggression and conflict, 6(1), 107-126. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00005.jay

Published

2022-05-30

How to Cite

Dysa, O. ., & Chumak, A. . (2022). Psychological features of application of non-normative vocabulary in interpersonal communication. Psychological Prospects Journal, 39, 69-86. https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2022-39-dus

Similar Articles

171-180 of 219

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.