The role of language within the context of migrants’ identity and acculturation

Authors

  • Inna Tarasiuk Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2021-37-233-243

Keywords:

multicultural society, theory of language communication, social identity, ethnolinguistic identity, communicative adaptation.

Abstract

Purpose. Current political and social development underscores the importance of language in the context of the national, cultural, and social identity of an individual. Notably, the matter of language and its functions becomes more prominent within the framework of effective integration of migrants into a foreign language environment. According to recent research and population surveys in multicultural societies, language is a critical aspect of integration. Therefore, it facilitates migrants’ acculturation. The purpose of the article is to review and analyze existing theories of linguistic communication in the context of personal identity. Method. To reach the declared objective, basic methods of theoretical research have been utilized, namely analysis, synthesis, comparison, and generalization. Results. In 2017, the Pew Research Center in Washington published the results of a worldwide survey, featuring migrants as central respondents. The study shows that mastering the language of the dominant majority is a prerequisite for becoming an integral part of society. To examine the impact of language on the lives of migrants in a foreign language environment, numerous theories on language communication have been developed. One of the most renowned theories regarding the phenomenon of identity is the social identity theory (SIT), which considers language a sign a person utilizes to indicate their social identity and affiliation to a certain group. Ethnolinguistic identity theory (EIT) highlights the interdependence between ethnic and linguistic identities. The emphasis is put not only on speech actions but also on the socio-psychological processes that underlie intercultural communication. Socio-psychological factors that influence the process of communication between different speakers constitute the subject matter of the communication accommodation theory (CAT). In the process of such communication, elimination of speech differences or, conversely, their accentuation occurs (i.e. through a dialect or sociolect). Conclusions. In the context of acculturation, language functions as a medium for the exchange of information regarding affiliation with a particular social group. Furthermore, dialects and accents indicate the peculiarities of one’s regional origin. Migrants use dialects and accents to identify themselves with certain social groups. Knowledge of the language of the dominant majority opens up additional prospects for study and work, whereas knowledge of the language of one's ethnic group allows maintaining contacts with their ethnic community. This is the core principle of integration and consequently effective acculturation. The conclusions and generalizations obtained are to be used in an empirical study concerning the psychology of acculturation of foreign students to a foreign language environment.

References

Adler P. (1997). Beyond cultural identity: reflections on cultural and multicultural man. Cultural learning: Concepts, application and research. R. W. Bristian (Ed.), 24–41. Honolulu.

BAMF (n.d.) Retrived from http://www.bamf.de/DE/Willkommen/ DeutschLernen/Integrationskurse/integratioskurse-node.html

Benet-Martínez, V., & Haritatos, J. (2005). Bicultural Identity Integration (BII): Components and Psychosocial Antecedents. Journal of Personality, 73(4), 1015–1050.

Berry, J. W. (2003). Conceptual approaches to acculturation. Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement, and applied research, 17–37. Washington, DC: APA.

Berry, J. W., Phinney, J. S., Sam, D. L., & Vedder, P. (2006). Immigrant youth: Acculturation, identity, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55(3), 303–332.

Berry, J. W. (2017). Introduction to mutual intercultural relations. Mutual intercultural relations, 1–33. Cambridge: CUP.

BMI (2017) Sprache ist der Schlüssel zur Integration. Retrived from https:// www.bmi.bund.de / Shared Docs / pressemitteilungen / DE / 2017 / 06 integrationskursverordnung.html

Cato Bakk, A. (2011). Eine soziolinguistische Untersuchung zu den Auswirkungen des Bilinguismus auf die Identität österreichischer Jugendlicher mit Migrationshintergrund. Zugriff über Universitätsbibliothek Universität Wien.

Dück, K. (2014). Zum Zusammenhang von Sprache und ethnischer Identität der zweiten Generation der Deutschen aus der ehemaligen Sowjetunion. Deutsche Sprache, 42(3), 261–274.

Gallois, Cyndy; Ogay, Tania; Giles, Howard (2005). Communication Accommodation Theory: A look Back and a Look Ahead. Theorizing About Intercultural Communication, 121—148. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Giles, H., & Johnson, P. (1987). Ethnolinguistic identity theory: A social psychological approach to language maintenance. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 68(1), 69–99.

Giles, Howard; Coupland, Joustine; Coupland, N. (1991). Accommodation Theory: Communication, Context, and Consequence. Contexts of Accommodation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Giles, Howard; Ogay, Tania (2007). «Communication Accommodation Theory». Explaining Communication: Contemporary Theories and Exemplars. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Giles, Howard; Smith, Philip (1979). «Accommodation Theory: Optimal Levels of Convergence». Language and Social Psychology. Baltimore: Basil Blackwell.

Hoffmann-Nowotny, H.-J. (2000). Migration, soziale Ungleichheit und ethnische Konflikte. Migration, gesellschaftliche Differenzierung und Bildung, 157–178. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.

Makarova, E. (2008). Akkulturation und kulturelle Identität. Eine empirische Studie unter Jugendlichen mit und ohne Migrationshintergrund in der Schweiz. Prisma, 8. Bern.

Naglo, K. (2007). Rollen von Sprache in Identitätsbildungsprozessen multilingualer Gesellschaften in Europa. Frankfurt: Lang.

Norris, S. (2007). The micropolitics of personal, national and ethnic identity. Discourse & Society, 18(5), 653–674.

Pew Research Centre (2017). What It Takes to Truly Be ‘One of Us’. U.S., Canada, Europe, Australia and Japan, publics say language matters more to national identity than birthplace. Retrived from https://www.pewglobal.org/ 2017/02/01/what-it-takes-to-truly-beone-of-us/

Schmid, W. (2006). Integriert ist, wer sich akzeptiert fühlt. Terra cognita, 9, 14–17.

Spolsky, B. (2004). Language Policy. Cambridge: CUP.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 33–53. Monterey: Brooks/Cole.

Tamimi Sa’d, S. H. (2017). Foreign language learning and identity reconstruction: Learners’ understanding of the intersections of the self, the other and power. CEPS Journal, 7(4), 13–36.

Turner, Lynn H.; West, Richard (2010). Communication Accommodation Theory. Introducing Communication Theory: Analysis and Application (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Vedder, P., & Virta, E. (2005). Language, ethnic identity, and the adaptation of Turkish immigrant youth in the Netherlands and Sweden. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(3), 317–337.

Published

2021-06-15

How to Cite

Tarasiuk , I. (2021). The role of language within the context of migrants’ identity and acculturation. Psychological Prospects Journal, 37, 233–243. https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2021-37-233-243

Similar Articles

191-200 of 399

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.