Критичний дискурс-аналіз як метод дослідження полі¬тичного дискурсу в соціальних медіа

Dmytro О. Iarovyi

doi:10.29038/2227-1376-2017-29-244-256

Authors

Dmytro О. Iarovyi Institute of Social and Political Psychology of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2017-29-244-256

Abstract

The use of the social media diplomacy in political discourse is indisputably getting more popular every year. In this regard social media are the way of reaching each member of the society directly and quickly, allowing them to interact with the audience. This article is aimed at studying the specific features of political discourse in social media and offering the paradigm for its analysis. With this aim, a research of the nature of political discourse in social media is first conducted. It is explained that this discourse is developing in the conditions of high competition for public attention, thus requires to be interactive (even proactive), credible, and reach the target audience. Based on this position, an explanation of the method suitable for the analysis, critical discourse analysis, is provided. Due to the nature of research area, such method seems legitimate for identifying, interpreting and explaining power relations and competition of discourses. Moreover, for the case of Ukrainian society and civil confrontation taking place in it critical discourse analysis could provide necessary answers in terms of avoiding negative consequences.

Key words: critical discourse analysis, social media, soft power, civil confrontation.

References

1. Fairclough N. Discourse and Social Change / N. Fairclough. − London : Cambridge Polit Press, 1992. – 259 p.
2. Ismail S. Authenticity Issues of Social Media: Credibility, Quality and Reality / S. Ismail, R. Latif // World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. – 2013. – № 74. – P. 265–272.
3. Jorgensen М. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method / M. Jorgensen, L. Phi¬llips. − Thousand Oaks : SAGE, 2010. – 320 p.
4. Lozev K. The digital diplomacy potential / K. Lozev, A. Murray // KM World. – 2013. – № 22 (6). – P. 22.
5. Nye J. Public Diplomacy and Soft Power. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science / J. Nye // Public Diplomacy in a Changing World. – 2008. – № 616. – P. 94–109.
6. Price V. Normative and informational influences in online political discussions. Communication Theory / V. Price, L. Nir, J. N. Cappella. – 2006. – 16 (1). – Р. 47–74.
7. Westcott N. Digital diplomacy: the impact of the Internet on International relations / N. Westcott // Research Report of Oxford Internet Institute. – 2008. – № 16. – 20 p.
8. Xiguang L. Web-based public diplomacy: the role of social media in the Iranian and Xinjiang riots / L. Xiguang, W. Jing // Journal of International Commu¬nication. – 2010. – № 16 (1). – P. 7–22.
9. Zhonga X. Public diplomacy meets social media: a study of the U. S. Embassy’s blogs and micro-blogs / X. Zhonga, J. Lu // Public Relations Review. – 2013. – № 39. – P. 542–548.