Issues of Practices in Matrimonial Partnership and Parenthood
Keywords:
discourse, problematisation, practice, family, marriage, parenthood, partnershipAbstract
The article deals with the analysis of the content of various practices of matrimonial partnership and parenthood, the formation and coexistence of which became possible due to the pluralisation of the discourse of the traditional family, marriage and parenthood. Practices are considered as social constructs, their plurality being provided by freedom of discourse choice. The family, marriage, parenthood discourse constructs social meanings, reflecting the way of life, where, along with traditional forms of marriage and family relationships is made possible another beyond- structural and non-linear way of integrity, that enables the individual to form different identities, choosing freely different practices of matrimonial partnership and parenthood. It is mentioned that the tendency to erase the boundaries between opposing entities that is manifested in a different attitude to sexual identity (presented by models of homosexual or lesbian relations practices) is another way to organize the individual's own life. Within the marriage and family relationship discourse pluralisation, men/women can acquire a new identity, each of which implies a certain behaviour in the context of different practices of partnership and parenthood. Modern realities show us the different types of gender identity, their practicing is caused by the individual choice. It is noted that transgendernism is characterized by mobility and fluctuation in relation to pre-existing immutable gender roles and sex. The personality constructs its vital (life) world in accordance with its intentions and changes in an appropriate way. Therefore, the family, marriage, parenthood are flexible discursive constructs where are problematised discursive practices. The author suggests that there is a semantic differential in vital (life) senses of practice constructions of the past and present as a natural change of generations, values, motivational attitudes (sets), sexuality, intimacy, femininity, masculinity, androgyny, asexuality, parenthood.
References
2. Гидденс Э. Трансформация интимности / Э. Гидденс. – СПб. : Питер, 2004. – 208 с.
Giddens A. [The transformation of Intimacy. Sexualitu, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies] Anthony Giddens. – Cambridge : Polity Press, 1992; Palo Alto: Stanford University Press. – 208 p.
3. Ильин И. П. Постструктурализм, Деконструктивизм, Постмодернизм /
И. Ильин. – М. : Интрада, 1996. – 256 с.
Ilyin I. Poststrukturalizm, Dekonstruktivizm, Postmodernizm [Poststructuralism, Deconstructionism, Postmodernism ] / I. Ilyin // Poststructuralizm, Dekonstructi- vizm, Postmodernizm. – Moscov : Intrada, 1996. – 256p.
4. Кожемякин Е. О. Институциональные дискурсы: программа сравнительных исследований / Е. А. Кожемякин // Человек. Сообщество. Управление. – 2007. – № 2. – С. 96–106.
Kozhemyakin E. Institucionalnye discursy:programma sravnytelnych issledovaniy [Institutional discourses: a program of comparative research] / E. Kozhemyakin // Chelovek. Soobshestbo. Upravleniye. – 2007. – № 2. – P. 96–106.
5. Можейко М. А. Переоткрытие времени [Електронний ресурс] / М. А. Мо- жейко. – Режим доступу : http://meget.kiev.ua/dictionary-postmodern. Mozheyko, M. Pereotkritiye vremeny [Rediscovery of time] [online resource]
/ Mozheyko M.– http://meget.kiev.ua/dictionary-postmodern.;
6. Рено А. Эра индивида / А. Рено. – СПб. : Владимир Даль, 2002. – С. 409–438. Reno A. Era individa [The era of the individual ] / А. Renо. – SPb : Vladimir Daly, 2002. – P. 409–438.
7. Теория и методология психологии: Постнеклассическая перспектива ТЗЗ / Отв. ред. А. Л. Журавлев, А. В. Юревич. – М. : Изд-во «Институт психологии РАН», 2007. – 528 с.
Teoriya i metodologiya psihologiyi: Postneklasicheskaya perspective ТZZ /
А. Zhuravlyov, А. Yurevich.– Moscov : Institut psihologiyi RAN, 2007. – 528 p.
8. Як будувати власне майбутнє: життєві завдання особистості: наук. монографія
/ [Т. М. Титаренко ; О. Г. Злобіна, Л. А. Лєпіхова та ін.]; за наук. ред. Т. М. Титаренко ; Нац. акад. пед. наук України, Ін-т соціальної та політ. психол. – Кіровоград : Імекс -ЛТД, 2012. – 512 с.
Yak buduvaty vlasne maybutnye: zhittyevi zavdannya osobistostyi [How to build your own future: the vital tasks of the individual] / T. Titarenko, O. Slobina,
L. Lyepichova // Nacionalna akademiya pedagogichnich nauk Ukraiyni, Institut socialnoyi ta politichnoyi psichologiyi. – Kirovograd : Імеx-LTD, 2012.
– 512 p.
9. Фуко М. Воля к истине: по ту сторону знания, власти и сексуальности. Работы разных лет. / М. Фуко ; пер. с франц. – М. : Касталь, 1996. – 448 с. Foucault Michel. Volya k istinye [The Will to Knowledge ] / M.Foucault [per.
s franc.]. – Moscov :Kastaly. – 1996. – 448 p.
10. Хабермас Ю. Комунікативна дія і дискурс – дві форми повсякденної кому- нікації / Ю. Хабермас // Ситниченко Л. А. Першоджерела комунікативної філософії. – К. : Либідь, 1996. – С. 84 – 90.
Habermas Y. Komunicativna diya s diskurs – dvi formy povsyakdennoyi komy- nicachiyi [Communicative action and discourse – two forms of everyday communication] / L. Sitnichenko // Pershodzerela komynicativnoyi filosofiyi. – Kiyev : Libedy. – 1996. – P. 84–90.
