ҐЕНЕЗА ПОНЯТТЯ «ПСИХОЛОГІЧНИЙ ПОТЕНЦІАЛ ПІДЛІТКА»

Тетяна Сватенкова

doi:10.29038/2227-1376-2022-40-sva

Authors

Tetyana Svatenkova Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2022-40-sva

Keywords:

psychological potential, adolescent, giftedness, personality

Abstract

Purpose of the article is to investigate the specifics of the scientific opinion’s regarding development of the teenager`s psychological potential.

Methods. Theoretical: exploratory and analytical methods such as relevant literature analysis on the topic, comparison, analogy, systematization and juxtaposition.

The results. The problem of the individual`s potential is a centuries-old practice material in scientific knowledge that has not yet been fully mastered by science, primarily in the part where the ideal of human development appears as something that has an independent ontological status and is potentially characteristic of a person. This problem`s formulation creates the need to understand the potential as different from the actual form of real existence. The potential self is even more real than the actual self of a person, since it is able to induce him to change his psychological and physical state in some sense.

The concept of the individual`s psychological potential is the most valuable methodological achievement in the 20th century`s psychology developed and such that continues to be developed in the XXI century. The individual`s psychological potential in psychological science is usually perceived as (1) unused abilities and skills, (2) unexpressed activity, unexpressed initiative. The rapid science development and the active transformation of the education system demonstrate not the utopian nature, but the reality of the transhumanism provisions and the new concept of human evolution.

The some children’і potential is rhetorically and philosophically combined with the potential of all humanity. Today, gifted children, the so-called "high-potential subjects", are still often depicted in academic and political discourse as hidden resources of humanity, ready to improve it given the right stimuli, and the education role in finding and using these stimuli is brought to the foreground.

Conclusions. The article highlights the results of scientific and theoretical research on the views` development on the individual`s potential in adolescence. A short historical and psychological excursion highlights the main results of scientific and educational discussions around this concept and the evolution of the view from identifying, measuring and controlling its development to supporting and believing in the inexhaustibility of the each individual`s potential, obvious achievements` regardless.

References

Zlobina, O. (2004). Osobystistʹ yak subʺyekt sotsialʹnykh zmin [Personality as a subject of social changes]. K.: NAS of Ukraine, Institute of Sociology. [in Ukrainian].

Alamprese, J. A. (1989). No gift wasted: Effective strategies for educating highly able, disadvantaged students in mathematics and science. Volume II: Case studies. Final Report. Washington: COSMOS.

Apter, T. (2022). The Teen Interpreter: A Guide to the Challenges and Joys of Raising Adolescents. W. W. Norton Company.

Blakemore, S.J. (2016). Inventing Ourselves: The Secret Life of the Teenage Brain. PublicAffairs.

Burks, S., Jensen, B., Williams, D., Lewis, T. M. (1930). The promise of youth: Follow-up studies of a thousand gifted children. Genetic studies of genius, III. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Cigman, R. (2006). The gifted child: A conceptual enquiry. Oxford Review of Education, 32(2),197–212.

Coleman, J. (2021). The Teacher and the Teenage Brain. Routledge.

Cook, D. T. (2002). Interrogating symbolic childhood. In Symbolic childhood. (рр. 1-15). New York: Peter Lang.

Increasing opportunities for young people and helping them to achieve their potential. Subsequently available as 2010 to 2015 government policy: young people. (2013). https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/2010-to-2015-government-policy-young-people/2010-to-2015-government-policy-young-people

Feldman, D. H., Goldsmith, L.T. (1986). Nature’s Gambit: Child prodigies and the development of human potential. Teachers College Pr

Freeman, J. (2010). Gifted lives: What happens when gifted children grow up?. New York: Routledge.

Freud, A. (1958). Adolescence. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 13 (1), 255-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/00797308.1958.11823182

Glausiusz, J. (2022). How can we help kids cope with 'eco-anxiety'? Family tree. Psychology. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20220315-how-eco-anxiety-affects-childrens-minds

Hill, J. (2021). Sophie Scholl: Student who resisted Hitler and inspires Germany. BBC Berlin correspondent. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-57008360

Hollingworth, L. (1942). Children above 180 IQ: Origin and development. London: George G. Harrap. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

James, A., Prout, A. (1997). Re-presenting childhood: Time and transition in the study of childhood. In Constructing and reconstructing childhood. Abingdon: Routledge Falmer.

Lucey, H., Reay, D. (2002). Carrying the beacon of excellence: Social class differentiation and anxiety at a time of transition. Journal of Education Policy 17(3), 321–336.

Ofsted. 2014. The Report of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills 2013/14: Schools (Manchester, www.ofsted.gov.uk/resources/140178).

Rawlins, R. (2006). Raising ‘‘Precocious’’ children: From nineteenth-century pathology to twentiethcentury potential. In When science encounters the child. Ed. B. Beatty, E. D. Cahan, J. Grant. (р. 77-95). New York: Teachers College.

Reynolds, K., Yates, P. (1998). Too soon: Representations of childhood death in literature for children. In Children in culture: Approaches to childhood. Ed. K. Lesnik-Oberstein. (рр.151- 177). London: Macmillan.

Svatenkova, T. I., & Svatenkov, A. V. (2021). Emotional potential in the children's team. Wiadomosci lekarskie (Warsaw, Poland : 1960), 74(11 cz 1), 2738–2742. https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek202111110

Shuttleworth, S. (2010). The mind of the child: Child development in literature, science, and medicine, 1840–1900. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Terman, L. M. (1919). The measurement of intelligence: An explanation of and a complete guide for the use of the stanford revision and extension of the binet-simon intelligence scale. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

Uprichard, E. (2008). Children as ‘Beings and Becomings’: children. Childhood and Temporality. Children & Society 22, 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2007.00110.x

Von K., C., & Winner, E. (2005). Extreme Giftedness. In R. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftedness (pp. 377-394). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610455.022