ТРЕНІНГОВА ПРОГРАМА ГАРМОНІЗАЦІЇ ПОЧУТТЯ ВЛАСНОСТІ

Ірина Губеладзе

doi:10.29038/2227-1376-2021-37-40-54

Authors

Iryna Hubeladze Institute of Social and Political Psychology of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2021-37-40-54

Keywords:

sense of ownership, psychological property, harmonization of sense of ownership, training program, psychoeducation.

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the article is to develop the content and structure and presentation as well of the author's training program to harmonize the sense of ownership of the person. Methods. A number of methods for interactive work and psychoeducation were used to develop the training program in order to the sense of ownership harmonize: the method of incomplete sentences, role play, simulation, brainstorming, group work, discussion, psychological workshops, creative homework and more. Results. The article presents the author's training program to harmonize the sense of ownership, which consists of an introduction, final part and three main modules: "Sense of ownership as a socio-psychological phenomenon: mine, ours, someone else's, nobody's", "Factors of strengthening the sense of ownership: control, self-investment and intimate knowledge"," Consequences and opportunities for sense of ownership harmonization". Each of the modules aims to develop different components of a sense of ownership: control, self-investment of money, time or other resources and deep intimate knowledge. The total amount of the training program is 26 academic hours. The proposed training program can be used to harmonize the sense of ownership, both among high school and university students, and among the adult population in general. Conclusions. The introduction and study of the effectiveness of the training program to harmonize the sense of ownership showed the feasibility of its use among high school and student youth, as well as adults, which helped to optimize responsibility, self-efficacy, self-identity and involvement. The prospects for further research are in the development of a psychological training program to harmonize the sense of ownership of the local community and own country.

References

Beaglehole, E. (2015). Property: A Study in Social Psychology. London. Psychology Press.

Burmenko, T. D., Karnyshev, A. D. (2003). Sobstvennost: Psykholoho-Economicheskiy Analyz [Ownership: Psycho-Economic Analysis]. Irkutsk [in Russian].

Hubeladze, I. (2019). Sotsial’ni praktyky volodinnia yak prostir realizatsii pochuttia vlasnosti [Social practices of possession as a space for sense of ownership implementation]. Naukovi studii iz sotsial’noi ta politychnoi psykhologii - Scietific Studios on Social and Political Psychology, 46 (49), 242–250. DOI: 10.33120/ ssj.vi46(49).173

James, W. (1991). Psykholohyya [Psychology]. Moscow [in Russian].

Jussila, I., Tarkiainen, A., Sarstedt, M. & Hair, J. F. (2015). Individual Psychological Ownership: Concepts, Evidence, and Impications for Research in Marketing. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 23(2), 121–139. DOI: 10.1080/10696679.2015.1002330

Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L. and Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193–206. DOI: 10.1257/jep.5.1.193

Karamushka, L. M., & Khodakevych, O. H. (2017). Psykholohichni osoblyvosti stavlennia studentskoi molodi do hroshei [Psychological features of students' attitude to money]. Kyiv: KNEU [in Ukrainian].

Khazratova, N. (2009). Psykholohichna Pryroda Pochuttya Vlasnosti [Psychological Nature of Sense of Ownership]. Sotsialna Psykholohiya - Social Psychology, 5, 103–110 [in Ukrainian].

Nartova-Bochaver, S. K. (2008). Chelovek Suverennyy: Psykholohycheskoe Issledovaniye Subiekta v Eho Bytii [Man is Sovereign: the Psychological Study of the Subject in His Being]. St. Petersburg: Peter [in Russian].

Noguti, V. & Bokeyar, A. L. (2014). Who am I? The relationship between self-concept uncertainty and materialism. International Journal of Psychology, 49(5), 323–333. DOI: 10.1002/ijop.12031

Pipes R. (2008). Sobstvennost i Svoboda [Ownership and Freedom]. Moskva: Moscow School of Political Studies [in Russian].

Peck, J., & Shu, S. B. (Eds.). (2018). Psychological Ownership and Consumer Behavior. Springer International Publishing. Retrieved from DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77158-8.

Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T. & Dirks, K. T. (2002). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7(1). DOI: 10.1037//108/0-9-2680.7.1.84

Poretski, L., Arazy, O., Lanin, J., Nov, O. (2021). Who Owns What? Psychological Ownership in Shared Augmented Reality. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 150. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102611

Preston, S. D., Gelman, S. A. (2020). This land is my land: Psychological ownership increases willingness to protect the natural world more than legal ownership. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 70. 101443. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101443

Zubiashvili, I. K. (2018). Treninhovi praktyky u sotsialno-psykholohichnomu zabezpechenni monetarnoi kultury starshoklasnykiv [Training practices in social and psychological support for high school students' monetary culture]. Orhanizatsiina psykholohiia. Ekonomichna psykholohiia. Sotsialna psykholohiia: zb. nauk. prats Instytutu psykholohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy - Organizational psychology. Economic psychology. Social psychology: coll. Science. Proceedings of the GS Institute of Psychology Kostyuk NAPS of Ukraine, 1, 48, 19–24 [in Ukrainian].