To the analysis of the question of variability of socio-psychological forms of psychic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2021-38-76-95Keywords:
image; psycho-gnostic problem; synergistic approach; socio-psychological taxonomy; formal-content system; form of psycheAbstract
Purpose. The article is devoted to the analysis of possibilities of application of theoretical and methodological background of the synergistic approach to a psycho-gnostic problem in the context of development of a question relatively the basis of variability of socio-psychological forms of psychic. Methods. Socio-psychological analysis of a psycho-gnostic problem in the point of view synergistic approach is used as a research method. Results. The specifics of the synergistic approach to the psycho-gnostic problem in its difference from the associative and generative approaches have been disclosed. The possibility to consider the content of the terminological construction «form of the psychic organization» as a formal-content system has been substantiated. In addition, it has been substantiated the necessity of differentiation the conditions of transition of psychic forms into socio-psychological and socio-psychological among ourselves. Conclusions. The analysis of available in the general psychological discourse the representations relatively the demarcation of psychic forms allowed to consideration the prerequisites of the specifics of the transition between certain forms of psychic organization. As such prerequisites are those, related with certain forms of psychic organization: mechanism for ensuring changes in the structure of the system; content as the main "product" of orderliness in this form; criterion of integration (orderliness) of psychic content into the "form of the whole". However, as a result of the analysis remains open the question of specific criteria for integration within a particular form of psychic organization. Instead, the assumption is made that the criteria of integration into the form of the whole changes in the process of phylogenetic and ontogenetic development of the systemic organization of the psyche realized on the human. The obtained results of the analysis allow making sure that the further direction of research of the raised problematic contains prospects of the development within the limits of structural-integrative methodology.
References
Bruner, Dzh. (1977). Psikhologiya poznaniya. Za predelami neposredstvennoy informatsii [Psychology of cognition. Beyond immediate information]. M.: Progress. [in Russian].
Budanov, V. (2017). Metodologiya sinergetiki v postneklassicheskoy nauke i v obrazovanii [Methodology of synergy in postnonclassical science and education] М.: УРСС. [in Russian].
Vasylyuk, F. (1993). Struktura obraza [Image structure]. Voprosy psikholohyi – Voprosy Psykhologii. 5. 5–19. [in Russian].
Vyigotskiy, L. (1983). Istoriya razvitiya vysshikh psikhicheskikh funktsiy[The history of the development of higher mental functions]. Sobranie sochineniy: v 6-ti tomah. T.3. [Collected works: in 6 volumes. V3.] M.: Pedagogika. [in Russian].
Zhabotynskaya, S. (2018). Heneratyvyzm, kohnytyvyzm y Semantyka lynhvalʹnykh setey [Generativism, Cognitivism and the Semantics of Lingual Networks]. Doctrina multiplex, veritas una: zb. prats do yuvileyu Izabelly Rafayilivny Buniyatovoyi [The Doctrines many, one truth is: Coll. works for the anniversary of Isabella Raphael Buniatova]. K: Kyyivskyy un-t im. B. Hrinchenka, s. 99–141. [in Russian].
Zinchenko V. (2006) Soznaniye kak predmet i delo psikhologii [Consciousness as a subject and matter of psychology]. Metodologiya i istoriya psikhologii – Methodology and history of psychology. 1. 207-231. [in Russian].
Knyazeva, Ye. (2020). Strategii upravleniya dinamicheskoy slozhnostyu [Strategies of Dynamic Complexity Management.]. Forsayt – Foresight, 14(4). 34–45. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2020.4.34.45 [in Russian].
Koval, H. (2018) Do analizu problemy demarkatsiyi skladovykh sotsialʹno-psykholohichnoyi taksonomiyi. [To the issue of demarcation of socio-psychological taxonomy’s components]. Naukovi studiyi iz sotsialnoyi ta politychnoyi psykholohiyi – Scientific studios on social and political psychology. 46(49), 258-266. https://doi.org/10.33120/ssj.vi46(49).175 [in Ukrainian].
Leontyev, A. (1959). Problemyi razvitiya psihiki [Problems of the development of the psyche]. M.: Akademiya ped. nauk RSFSR. [in Russian].
Leontyev, A. (2012). Deyatelnost. Soznanie. Lichnost [Activity, consciousness, personality]. M: Kniga po trebovaniyu. [in Russian].
Leontyev, D. (2018). Zhizn na volnakh khaosa: uroki Prigozhina i Taleba [Life on the Waves of Chaos: Lessons from Prigogine and Taleb]. V kn.. Mobilis in mobili: lichnost v epokhu peremen [Mobilis in mobili: personality in an era of change]. Pod obshch. red. A. Asmolova. M.: Izdat-y Dom YASK. 29-40 [in Russian].
Petrenko, V. (2002) Konstruktivistskaya paradigma v psikhologicheskoy nauke [The constructivist paradigm in psychological science]. Psihologicheskiy zhurnal–Psychological journal. 23. 3, 113-121. [in Russian].
Petrenko, V. (2005). Psikhosemanticheskiye aspekty kartiny mira subyekta [Psychosemantic aspects of the subject's worldview]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal VSE–Psychology. HSE Journal. 2 (2), 3–23.
Smirnov, S. (1974). Dialektika otrazheniya i vzaimodeystviya v evolyutsii materii [Dialectics of reflection and interaction in the evolution of matter]. M.: Nauka. [in Russian].
Spenser, G. (1997). Sinteticheskaya filosofiya:v sokrashchonnom izlozhenii Kollinza [The synthetic philosophy by Herbert Spencer]. K.: Nika-tsentr:Vist-S. [in Russian].
Spitsyna, L. (2013). Istoryko-psykholohichnyy ta sotsiokulturnyy kontekst kohnityvnoho spilkuvannya [Historical-psychological and sociocultural context of cognitive communication]. V kn.. Zasady kohnityvnoyi psykholohiyi spilkuvannya [Principles of cognitive psychology of communication]. za nauk. red. V.Kazmirenka. ISPP NAPN. Kirovohrad: Imeks-LTD, 97–136. [in Ukrainian].
Rudenko, L. (2013). Noosferna filosofiya V.I. Vernadskoho – fundament staloho (zbalansovanoho) planetarnoho rozvytku [Noosphere philosophy VI Vernadsky - the foundation of sustainable (balanced) planetary development]. Ukrayinskyy heohrafichnyy zhurnal – Ukrainian Geographical Journal. 2, 7–12. [in Ukrainian].
Tkachenko, O. (2009). Pryntsypy, katehoriyi i metodolohichni problemy psykholohiyi [Principles, categories and methodological problems of psychology]. Psykholohiya i suspilstvo – Psychology and Society. 1(35), 44–133. [in Ukrainian].
Kholodnaya, M. (2002) Psikhologiya intellekta: paradoksy issledovaniya [Psychology of Intellect: Research Paradoxes.]. SPb.: Piter. [in Russian].
Tsigen, T. (1998) Fiziologicheskaya psikhologiya v 14-ti lektsiyakh [Physiological Psychology in 14 Lectures]. V kn. Osnovnyye napravleniya psikhologii v klassicheskikh trudakh. Assotsiativnaya psikhologiya [The main directions of psychology in classical works. Associative psychology]. M: AST-LTD. [in Russian].
Shvalb, YU. (2018). Stavlennya do pryrody i svitu v suchasnomu sposobi zhyttya: istoryko-kulturni aspekty [Attitudes towards nature and the world in the modern way of life: historical and cultural aspects]. V kn.. Ekolohichna psykholohiya : khrestomatiya [Environmental psychology: a textbook]. za nauk. red. YU. Shvalba. ISPP NAPN. K.: Instytut psykholohiyi imeni H. S. Kostyuka NAPN Ukrayiny, 2018. 224 с. С. 7–16. [in Ukrainian].
Engelgardt, V. (1970) Integratizm – put ot prostogo k slozhnomu v poznanii yavleniy zhizni [Integratism - the path from simple to complex in the knowledge of the phenomena of life]. Voprosy filosofii – Philosophy questions. 11, 103–115.
Boulding, К. (1956) General Systems Theory - the Skeleton of a Science. Management Science, 2, 3, 197–208.
Bruner, J. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64(2), 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043805
Chomsky, N. (1956). Three models for the description of language. IRE Transactions on information theory, 2(3), 113–124.
Haken, H. (2009) Synergetics: Basic Concepts. In: Hutt A., Haken H. (eds) Synergetics. Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science Series. pp 5-30. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0421-2_533
Kool V.K., Agrawal R. (2020) Environmental Psychology: Lessons from Gandhi. In: Gandhi and the Psychology of Nonviolence, Vol. 2. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56989-1_1
Roginskii, A., Perchenok, F., & Borisov, V. (1993). Community as the source of Vernadsky's concept of noosphere. Configurations, 1(3), 415–438. https://doi.org/10.1353/con.1993.0018
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Psychological Prospects Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
