ПСИХОЛОГІЧНІ ОСОБЛИВОСТІ ІНТЕГРАТИВНОЇ ФУНКЦІЇ МІФУ В КОНТЕКСТІ ЙОГО ЗІСТАВЛЕННЯ З ІСТОРІЄЮ

Volodymyr Savchuk

doi:10.29038/2227-1376-2019-34-219-231

Authors

Volodymyr Savchuk Ostroh Academy National University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1360-4087

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2019-34-219-231

Keywords:

myth, narrative, perception, historical memory, collective identity, integrative function.

Abstract

The paper includes the analysis of similarities and differences between the notions of myth and history paying attention to psychological aspects of the phenomena studied. The author researches into the distortive nature of the myth in reflection of objective reality, and the role which chronological remoteness plays in correlation between myth and history. The paper outlines the integrative function of the myth in the context of conventionalist theory of the nation. It indicates the role of the myth as a marker of belonging to a specific community. It characterizes the position taken by the image of a hero in the structure of the myth, and the function of foundation narratives. The author studies the location of the myth in the system of one’s identity, focusing on the national self-identification. The paper analyzes psychological motivation of myth creation and an individual’s mythological needs. It characterizes the therapeutic effect myth has on a human and traces the peculiarities of creation, development and demise of myths in comparison with similar processes in the history of nations. The author studies the use of historical narratives in political field in the context of aggression and defense as well as the character of the employment of myths for political consolidation. The paper encompasses the analysis of the essence of reactionary myths as a response of one’s psyche to changes which affect the individual’s worldview, especially in the midst of conflict between conservative convictions and revolutionary trends. Finally, it outlines the three-phase process of myth’s historization.

References

1. Barthes, R. (2017). Mifologii [Mythologies] (S. Zasyekina, Trans.). Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt [in Russian].
2. Vinogradova, S. M., & Melnik, G. S. (2014). Psihologiya massovoy kommunikatsii: uchebnik dlia bakalavrov [Psychology of mass communication: a textbook for undergraduate students]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Yurayt [in Russian].
3. Hyrych, I. & Shapoval, Yu. (2010). Chomu neobkhidno pereosmysliuvaty mynule? [Why should we reconsider the past?]. Kyiv: Konrad Adenauer Foundation [in Ukrainian].
4. Freud, S. (1998). Ocherki po psihologii seksualnosti [Essays on the psychology of sexuality] (M. Drako, Trans.). Minsk: Popurri [in Russian].
5. Shcherbakov, V. P. (2001) Mif v psihoanalize [Myth in psychoanalysis]. Smisli mifa: mifologia v istorii i culture. Sbornik v chest 90-letia prof. M. I. Shahnovicha. Seria “Misliteli” [Meanings of the myth in history and culture. The collection deicated to Prof. M. I. Shahnovich’s 90th birthday. “The Thinkers” Series], 8, 300 [in Russian].
http://anthropology.ru/ ru/text/shcherbakov-vp/mif-v-psihoanalize
6. Adler, A. (1968). On the role of the unconscious in neurosis. Practice and theory of Individual Psychology (pp. 227-234). Totowa, N. J.: Littlefield, Adams.
7. Boia, L. (2001). History and Myth in Romanian Consciousness (J. C. Brown, Trans.). Budapest: Central European University Press.
8. Bryden, I. (2005). Reinventing King Arthur: The Arthurian Legends in Victorian Culture. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
9. May, R. (1991). The Cry for Myth. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
10. Myths and nationhood (1997). G. Hosking, & G. Schopflin (Eds.). New York: Routledge.
11. Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and Narrative (K. McLaughlin, & D. Pellauer, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Segesten, A. D. (2011). Myth, Identity and Conflict: A Comparative Analysis of Romanian and Serbian Textbooks. Lanham: Lexington Books.
13. Seton-Watson, H. (1977). Nations and States: An Enquiry into the Origins of Nations and the Politics of Nationalism. Boulder, Colorado: Westview.
14. Smith, J. Z., Buxton, R. G. A., & Bolle, K. W. (2018, October 13). Myth. Retrieved from Encyclopaedia Britannica website: https://www.britannica.com/topic/ myth#ref23605.
15. Smith, N. C. (2016). King Arthur and the historical myth of England: a child’s guide to nationalism and identity in the Victorian era. College of Arts & Sciences Senior Honors Theses, 124, 35.
16. Torrecilla, J. (2009). Spanish Identity: Nation, Myth, and History. Studies in 20th & 21st Century Literature, 33(2), 204-226.
doi:10.4148/2334-4415.1699
17. Trevor-Roper, H. (1988). Invention of tradition. London: University Press, Cambridge.