Емпіричне дослідження досвіду рефлексії майбутніх психологів

Stanislav Tabachnikov; Natalia Mikhalchuk; Yevgenii Kharchenko; Eduard Ivashkevych

doi:10.29038/2227-1376-2019-33-248-260

Authors

Stanislav Tabachnikov State institution “Research Institute of Psychiatry” of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6771-6412
Natalia Mikhalchuk Rivne State University of the Humanities https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0492-9450
Yevgenii Kharchenko State institution “Research Institute of Psychiatry” of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4340-8503
Eduard Ivashkevych Rivne State University of the Humanities https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0376-4615

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2019-33-248-260

Keywords:

a special competence, a social competence, a personal competence, the individual competence, the individual experience, reflexive experience, the interpretative competence, a narrative

Abstract

The article deals with four types of competence that facilitate the development of the experience of reflection of future psychologists: 1) a special competence is the possession of our own professional activities at a sufficiently higher level, the ability of the person to design their further professional development; 2) a social competence is the possession of joint (group, co-operative) professional activity, cooperation, and it was also adopted by these professional methods, such as the methods of professional communication; a social competence is a social responsibility for value of the results of our work; 3) a personal competence is a possession of methods of personal presentation and self-development, means of confrontation with professional deformations of a person; 4) the individual competence is a possession of methods of self-realization and a process of the development of the individuality within the profession, readiness for professional growth, ability to individual self-preservation, resistance to professional burnout, ability to organize our work rationally, not overloading in time, carrying out activities with positive motivation, joy and energy.

It was shown that individual experience had valuable, reflexive, communicative, operational characteristics. It is this set of parameters of experience that ensures the independence of the psychologist, his purposeful activity. The results of the experimental studying, which was conducted during the training of future psychologists of experimental groups at higher school during the 2017, were described. With the students of experimental groups we organized training «Development of Interpretative Competence». At the end of each lesson, the method of narratives was used to refute students’ own activities, to reconstruct them with the actual meaning of their experiences, to illuminate and understand the essence and origin of the actual functioning of interpretative processes.

References

1. Derkach, A. A. (2000). Psixologiya razvitiya professionala [The Psychology of the development of a Professional]. Moscow: RAGS, 124 p. [in Russian].
2. Erickson, E. (2015). Shkala «Mii vlasnyi pohliad na sebe zaraz» [Scale «My own look at myself now»]. Electronic resource. Access mode: https://www. google.com. [in Ukrainian].
3. Kuhn, M., Mc Cartland, T. (2012). Test «Kto Ya?» [Test «Who am I?»] Electronic resource. Access mode: vsetesti.ru/424. [in Ukrainian].
4. Lactionov, А. N. (2000). Strukturno-dinamicheskaya organizaciya individual’nogo opyta [Structurally-dynamic organization of the individual experience]: Doctor’s thesis in Psychology: 19.00.01]. Kharkov, 451 p. [in Russian].
5. Litovchenko, N. F. (2007). Protses interpretatsii v psykhoterapii u konteksti dialohu psykholoha z kliientom [The process of interpretation in psychotherapy in the context of a dialogue between a psychologist and a client]. Dialogism as a form of the existence and the development of a person. Ed. by G. O. Ball, M.V. Papucha. Nizhyn: Milanic, pp. 195–230 [in Ukrainian].
6. Markovа, А. C. (1996). Psixologiya professionalizma [Psychology of professionalism]. Moscow. 308 p. [in Russian].
7. Nikitinа, І. V. (1999). Psykholohichni osoblyvosti subiektnoho samovyznachennia osobystosti v period povnolittia [Psychological peculiarities of the subjective self-determination of the person during the period of senior pupil]: Diss. ... for PhD in Psychology: 19.00.01. Кyiv. 209 p. [in Ukrainian].
8. Riker, P. (1995). Konflikt interpretacii [Conflict of interpretation]. Мoscow: Academia- Center, Medium. 414 p. [in Russian].
9. Chepeleva, N. V. (1997). Processy ponimaniya i interpretacii v deyatel’nosti prakticheskogo psixologa [Processes of understanding and interpretation in the professional activity of a practical psychologist]. Practical Psychology: Theory, Methods, Technology. Kyiv: NIKA-CENTER, pp. 102–108 [in Ukrainian].
10. Stolin, V. V. (2013). Standartyzovanyi opytuvalnyk samostavlennia [Standardized questionnaire of self-attitude]. Electronic resource. Access mode: https://www.google.com. [in Ukrainian].
11. Tolstykh, N. (2003). Metodyka nezavershenykh rechen [Method of unfinished sentences]. Electronic resource. Access mode: https://www.google.com.
12. Varban, M. Yu. (1998). Refleksiya professional’nogo stanovleniya v studencheskie gody [Reflection of the Professional growth of students: Diss. ... for PhD in Psychology: 19.00.07]. Kyiv. 210 p. [in Russian].