Ілюзія знання в метакогнітивному моніторингу: огляд можливих причин та наслідків

Ruslana Kalamazh; Maria Avhustiuk

doi:10.29038/2227-1376-2018-32-109-122

Authors

Ruslana Kalamazh National University of Ostroh Academy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2051-0732
Maria Avhustiuk National University of Ostroh Academy https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8041-5078

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2018-32-109-122

Keywords:

illusion of knowing, illusion of not knowing, metacognitive monitoring, overconfidence, underconfidence

Abstract

The paper highlights possible causes and consequences of the illusion of knowing in metacognitive monitoring of the learning activity of university students through the effects of different types of information proposed, and also of personal, cognitive, metacognitive, and individual psychological characteristics of university students (n = 262; M = 19,5; SD = 1,87). According to the results, the illusion of knowing occurring mostly in prospective judgements of learning can be caused by the type of information (it was higher in the statements), task type (it appeared in multiple-choice questions), text length (its levels were higher in larger texts) and style (overconfidence occurred while learning the texts of the belletristic style). Female students tended towards slight overconfidence and the illusion of knowing was more typical for younger students with lower levels of academic achievements. Possible consequences of the phenomenon, ways of its annihilation, and further avenues for research are also described.

References

1. Avhustiuk, M. M., Pasichnyk, I. D., & Kalamazh, R. V. (2018). The illusion of knowing in metacognitive monitoring: Effects of the type of information and of personal, cognitive, metacognitive, and individual psychological characteristics. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 14(2), 317–341.
https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v14i2.1418
2. Commander, N. E., & Stanwyck, D. J. (1997). Illusion of knowing in adult readers: Effects of reading skill and passage length. Journal: Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(1), 39–52.
https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1997.0925
3. Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J., & Kruger, J. (2003). Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(3), 83–87.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01235
4. Eakin, D. K. (2005). Illusions of knowing: Metamemory and memory under conditions of retroactive interference. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(4), 526–534.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.009
5. Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., & Kleinbölting, H. (1991). Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychological Review, 98(4), 506–528.
https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.98.4.506
6. Glenberg, A. M., Wilkinson, A. C., & Epstein, W. (1982). The illusion of knowing: Failure in the self-assessment of comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 10(6), 597–602.
https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03202442
7. Hacker, D. J., Bol, L., & Bahbahani, K. (2008). Explaining calibration in classroom contexts: The effects of incentives, reflection, and explanatory style. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 101–121.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9021-5
8. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1996). On the reality of cognitive illusions. Psychological Review, 103(3), 582=591.
https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.103.3.582
9. Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one’s own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(4), 349–370.
https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.126.4.349
10. Kroll, M. D., & Ford, M. L. (1992). The illusion of knowing, error detection, and motivational orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17, 371–378.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476x(92)90075-a
11. Metcalfe, J. (1998). Cognitive optimism: Self-deception or memory-based processing heuristics? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(2), 100–110.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0202_3
12. Pasichnyk, I., Kalamazh, R., & Avgustiuk, M. (2017). The illusion of knowing from perspective of metacognitive monitoring accuracy of educational activity of university students. Psychologiczne Zeszyty Naukowe: Polrocznik Instytutu Psychologii Uniwersytetu Zielonogorskiego, 1, 89–102.
13. Pulford, B. D. (1996). Overconfidence in human judgment. PhD Thesis. Department of Psychology, University of Leicester, 1–129.
14. Savin, Ye. Yu., & Fomin, A. Ye. (2013). Kognitivnaia psykhologia obrazovania: auditoria kak labolatoria [Cognitive psychology of education: Class-room as laboratory]. Psykhologia v vuze, 3, 67–83. [in Russian]
15. Tobias, S., & Everson, H. T. (1996). Assessing metacognitive knowledge monitoring. Issues in the Measurement of Metacognition, 147–222.