Логічний аналіз форм гумору при патологізації особистості.

Lyudmila F. Krupelnytska; Oksana M. Shportun

doi:10.29038/2227-1376-2017-29-136-151

Authors

Lyudmila F. Krupelnytska Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Oksana M. Shportun Київський національний університет імені ТарасаШевченка, докторант факультету психології

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2017-29-136-151

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of humor forms considering personality pathologization. Various forms of humor manifestation, in accordance with our proposed regulatory-level model, reflect the dominance of a certain level of regulation – biological, social, reflexive and personality. Normally humor functioning occurs involving different levels of regulation under the background control of personality level. Disabling the personality level of control or rigid fixation on a certain level of regulation is the most typical violation at psychic pathology. The analysis is based on two humor components: cognitive and affective and the most widespread violations of these components at psychic disorders. When in cognitive paradigm it comes to the discrepancy on the level of ideas and cognitions, then in affective one it comes to the affective discrepancy, contradiction between the affects, by which «are charged» the cognitions that come into collision. The article attention is focused on the variants combination of the content components of cognitive sphere with the functioning variety of affective sphere. To the most common cognitive sphere disorders are referred: lowering level of generalization, abstraction processes and distortion of generalization process; to the affective sphere disorders – affective lability, affective rigidity, depressive and manic tendencies, emotional stupidity. Changes in any component are reflected on humor functioning character. Taking into account that it may be many such changes in each component with the development of pathology, there will be more possible combinations that are resulted in changes of certain parameters of humor. Accordingly, we described 17 correlations of cognitive and affective components, which are formed by combinations of different variants of violations.

Key words: humor forms, pathologization of humor, cognitive component, affective component, correlation of cognitive and affective components.

References

1. Asmolov A. G. Psikhologiya lichnosti: printsipy obshchepsikhologicheskogo analiza [Psychology of personality: principles of psychological analysis] [Elektronnyi resurs] / A. G. Asmolov. – M. : Smysl, 2001. – Rezhim dostupa : www.fdp.hse.ru/ data/ 082/535/135/psix-lich.doc
2. Bakhtin M. M. Tvorchestvo Fransua Rable i narodnaya kultura Srednevekovya i Renessansa [Rabelais and his world, trans. H. Iswolsky] / M. M. Bakhtin. – M. : Khud. lit., 1990. – 543 s.
3. Bratus B. S. Anomalii lichnosti [Anomalies of personality] / B. S. Bratus. – M. : Mysl, 1988. – 348 s.
4. Borodenko M. V. Dva litsa Yanusa-smekha [The two faces of Janus – laugheter] / M. V. Borodenko. – R/nD. : Tsvetnaya pechat, 1995. – 86 s.
5. Vasilyuk F. E. Psikhologiya perezhivaniya (analiz preodoleniya kriticheskikh situatsyi) [Psychology of experience (analysis of overcoming the critical situations)] / F. E. Vasilyuk. – M. : MGU, 1984. – 200 s.
6. Vilunas V. K. Psikhologiya razvitiya motivatsiyi [Psychology of motivation development] / V. K. Vilunas. – SPb. : Rech, 2006. – 458 s.
7. Vygotskiy L. S. Psikhologiya razvitiya cheloveka [Psychology of human develop¬ment] / L. S. Vygotskiy. – M. : Smysl ; Eksmo, 2005. – 1136 s.
8. Vygotskiy L. S. Sobraniye sochineniy : v 6 t. T. 4. Detskaya psikhologiya [Col¬lected edition in 6 vol. Vol. 4. Child psychology] / L. S. Vygotskiy. – M. : Pedagogika, 1984. – 432 s.
9. Gladkikh N. V. Katarsis smekha i placha [Katharsis of laughing and crying] / N. V. Gladkikh // Vest. Tomsk. gos. ped. un-ta. Ser. : Gumanitarnyye nauki (filologiya) – Tomsk, 1999. – Vyp. 6 (15). – S. 88–92.
10. Dombrovskaya I. S. Yumor v kontekste razvitiya [Humor in the context of development] / I. S. Dombrovskaya. – IK “Neformat”, 2014. – 280 s.
11. Ivanova E. M. Psikhopatologiya i chuvstvo yumora [Abnormal psychology and a sense of humor] [Elektronnyi resurs] / E. M. Ivanova, S. N. Enikolopov // Trudnyy patsient. – 2009. – Iyul. – Rezhim dostupa : http://t-pacient.ru/articles/6443
12. Zaviyalov V. U. Smysl nerukotvornyy: metodologiya dianaliticheskoy terapiyi i konsultirovaniya [Miraculous meaning: methodology of dianalitical therapy and consulting] / V. U. Zaviyalov. – Novosibirsk : Manuskript, 2007. – 234 s.
13. Leontyev D. A. Chuvstvo yumora [A sense of humor] / D. A. Leontyev // Psycho¬logies. – 2007. – № 18. – Р. 44.
14. Mamardashvili M. K. Klassicheskiy i neklassicheskiy idealy ratsionalnosti [Clas¬sical and non-classical ideals of rationality] / M. K. Mamardashvili. – M. : Labirint, 1994. – 92 s.
15. Martin R. Psikhologiya yumora : per. s angl. [Psychology of humor] / R. Martin ; pod red. L. V. Kulikova. – SPb. : Piter, 2009. – 480 s.
16. Nosenko E. L. Styli ta formy proyavu humoru yak hipotetychni aspekty implitsyt¬noyi diagnostyky psykholohichnogo zdorovya [Styles and forms of humor manifestations as hypothetical aspects of implicit diagnostic of psychological health] / E. L. Nosenko, O. B. Kharchenko // Problemy suchasnoyi psykhologiyi. – 2010. – Vyp. 10. – S. 501–514.
17. Opykhailo O. B. Kharakter zvyiazku psykholohichnykh vlastyvostei osobystosti z riznymy formamy proyavu humoru [The relationships between the psychological personality traits and different forms of humor manifestation] [Elektronnyi resurs] / O. B. Opykhailo // Visn. Nats. akad. Derzh. prykordonnoyi sluzhby Ukrainy. – 2014. – Vyp. 2. – Rezhym dostupu : http://nbuv.gov.ua/j-pdf/Vnadps_2014_2_18.pdf
18. Popper K. R. Obyektivnoye znaniye. Evolyutsionnyi podhod : per. s angl. [Objec¬tive knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach] / K. R. Popper. – M. : Editorial URSS, 2002. – 384 s.
19. Rubinshteyn S. L. Osnovy obshchey psikhologii : v 2-kh t. T. 2 [Fundumentals of General Psychology : in 2 vol.] / S. L. Rubinshteyn. – M. : Pedagogika, 1989. – 328 s.
20. Rubinshteyn S. L. Ocherki, vospominaniya, materialy [Essays, memories, mate¬rials] / S. L. Rubinshteyn ; pod red. B. F. Lomova. – M. : Nauka, 1989. – 440 s.
21. Stefanenko E. A. Issledovaniye gelotofobiyi u bolnykh psikhicheskimi rasstroy¬stvami [The study of gelotophobia for patients with mental disorders] / E. A. Ste¬fanenko, E. M. Ivanova, S. N. Yenikolopov // Teoreticheskiye i prikladnyye problemy meditsinskoy psikhologii : sb. materialov Vseros. yubiley. nauch.-prakt. konf. (k 85-letiyu Yu. F. Poliakova) (14–15 fevr. 2013 g.). – M. : GOU VPO “Moskovskiy gorodskoy psikhologo-pedagogicheskiy universitet” i FGBU “NTsZP” RAMN, 2013. – S. 106–107.
22. Kharchenko O. B. Osobystisni faktory riznykh form proyavu humoru [Personal factors of different forms of humor manifestation] / O. B. Kharchenko // Visn. Dnipropetr. un-tu. Ser. : Рsykhologiya. – 2010. – № 9/1. – Vyp. 16. – S. 113–118.
23. Shcherbyna L. F. Metateoretychne myslennia psykhoterapevta: model, doslidzhe¬nnia, prohrama rozvytku [Meta-theoretical Thinking of Therapist: model, rese¬arch, program development] / L. F. Shcherbyna. – Kуіv : Heoprynt, 2012. – 283 s.
24. Apter M. J. A structural-phenomenology of play / M. J. Apter // Adult play: A reversal theory approach. – Amsterdam : Swets & Zeitlinger, 1991. – P. 13−29.
25. Apter M. J. A structural-phenomenology of play / M. J. Apter // Adult play: A reversal theory approach. – Amsterdam : Swets & Zeitlinger, 1991. – P. 13–29.
26. Frydenberg E. Thriving, surviving, or going under: Which coping strategies relate to which outcomes? / E. Frydenberg, R. Lewis // Thriving, surviving, or going under, University of Melbourne. – P. 3–23.
27. Lampert M. D. Cross-cultural variation in gelotophobia within the United States / M. D. Lampert, K. L. Isaacso, J. Lyttle // Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling. – 2010. – № 52 (2). – P. 202–216.
28. Polimeni J. Humor perception deficits in schizophrenia / J. Polimeni, J. P. Reiss // Psychiatry Research. – 2006. – Vol. 141. – Р. 229–232.
29. Proyer R. T. An Initial Study on How Families Deal with Ridicule and Being Laughed at: Parenting Styles and Parent – Child Relations with Respect to Geloto¬phobia, Gelotophilia, and Katagelasticism / R. T. Proyer, S. Estoppey, W. Ruch // Journal of Adult Development. − 2012. – Vol. 19, Issue 4. – P. 228–237.
30. Ruch W. Who fears being laughed at? The location of gelotophobia in the Eysencki- an PEN-model of personality / W. Ruch, R. Proyer // Personality and Individual Differences. – 2009. – № 46 (5–6). – P. 627–630.