Representation of Negative vs. Traumaticevents in Individual Memory

Authors

  • Larysa Zasiekina Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2016-28-129-139

Abstract

The results of theoretical and experimental research of life events
representation in individual memory are highlighted in the article. The differences between autobiographical and traumatic memory based on differentiation of emotionally negative and traumatic events were established. The differences in the propositional structures of representation separate emotionally negative and traumatic
events were revealed. The differences show the specifics of coding and encoding traumatic events which leads to the specifics in their recalling. This fact can play the important role for treating PTSD. The predominance of external agent in traumatic events vs. negative events representation was revealed. It shows the awareness of
different objective factors of the traumatic event and traumatic situation. The external agents in traumatic events representation are accompanied with the higher number of sentences, which proves the idea about vividness and easiness of traumatic events recalling. The correlation between external agent and different propositional structural
elements (attitude, external object, time) and psycholinguistic indices (number of words and sentences, lexical density) were revealed. It is in line with the idea about deep awareness of traumatic situation, diminishing the internal role and personal significance in traumatic event, which decreases the feeling of guilt and impedes development of PTSD. The future research will study the differences in traumatic events representation among individuals with PTSD which can improve the
techniques for PTSD treatment.

Keywords: autobiographical memory, traumatic memory, emotionally negative events, traumatic event, propositional structural elements.

Author Biography

  • Larysa Zasiekina, Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University
    доктор психологічних наук, про­фесор, завідувач кафедри загальної та соціальної психології Східноєвропейського національного університету імені Лесі Українки

References

1. Anderson J. R. A theory sentence memory as part of a general theory of memory / J. R. Anderson, R. Budiu, L. M. Reder // Journal of memory and language. – 2001. – Vol. 45. – Р. 337−367.
2. Autobiographical memory for stressful events, traumatic memory and posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review / P. L. Lorenzzoni, G. L. T. Silva, M. P. Po¬letto, Ch. H. Kristensen // Avancesen Psiсhologia Lationoamericana. – 2014. – Vol. 32 (3). – P. 361−376.
3. Berntsen D. Two versions of life: emotionally negative and positive life events have different roles in the organization of life story and identity / D. Berntsen, D. C. Rubin, I. C. Siegler // Emotion. – 2000. – Vol. 11 (15). – Р. 1190−1201.
4. Brewin C. R. Autobiographical memory for trauma: Update on four controversies / C. R. Brewin // Memory. – 2007. – Vol. 15 (3). – P. 227−248.
5. Development and preliminary validation of a brief broad-spectrum measure of trauma exposure: the traumatic life events questionnaire / E. S. Kubany, S. N. Haynes, M. B. Leisen et al. // Psychological Assessment. – 2000. – Vol. 12. – P. 210−224.
6. Norman D. A. Description: n intermediate stage in memory retrieval / D. A. Nor¬man, D. G. Bobrov // Cognitive Psychology. – 1979. – Vol. 11. – Р. 107−123.
7. Nourkova V. V. Why historical becomes personal? Spontaneous historical content of individual autobiographical memory / V. V. Nourkova, D. M. Bernstein ; Y. Zinchenko, V. Petrenko (eds.). − Moscow : Lomonosov State University, 2010. – P. 1−21.
8. Nurkova V. Biography becomes autobiography: Distorting the subjective past / V. Nurkova, D. M. Bernstein, E. F. Loftus // The American Journal of psychology. – 2014. – Vol. 117, No 1. – P. 65−80.
9. Pennebaker J. The secret life of pronouns: what our words say about us / J. Pennebaker. – New York : Bloomsbury Publishing, 2011. – 511 p.
10. Rubin D. C. Remembering our past: Studies in autobiographical memory / D. C. Rubin. − Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press, 1995. – 441 р.
11. Sotgiu I. Why autobiographical memories for traumatic and emotional events might differ: theoreticalarguments and empirical evidence / I. Sotgiu, M. L. Rus¬coni // The Journal of Psychology. – 2014. – Vol. 148 (5). – Р. 523−547.
12. Zasiekina L. Psycholinguistic reorganization of individual traumatic memory / L. Zasiekina // East European Journal of Psycholinguistics. – 2014. – Vol. 2. – P. 87−94.

Published

2016-12-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zasiekina, L. (2016). Representation of Negative vs. Traumaticevents in Individual Memory. Psychological Prospects Journal, 28, 129-139. https://doi.org/10.29038/2227-1376-2016-28-129-139